My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_1126_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_1126_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 9:28:01 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:39:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: 11 /26/O1 <br />IT'EM NO: L-1 <br />� e t roval: �� ana er A�.C�� Agenda Section: <br />LAND USE <br />Item Description: A request by Bradley Hoff, 1897 Shady Beach Avenue, for a Variance to <br />Section 1012.02B2 0£ the Roseville City Code (PF334� <br />1.0 REQUESTED ACTION <br />l.l Mr. Hoff has requested a 2-1/2 foot variance to Section 1012.02B2 (Certain Structures <br />Not Considered Encroachments) to allow a recently installed fence to be 6-1 /2 feet tall in <br />a front yard. <br />SECTION 1012.02B2 <br />Code Re uirement Existin Condition Variance Re uested <br />4 foot hei ht in front ard 6-1/2 foot hei ht in front ard 2-1/2 feet <br />PROJECT REVIEW HISTORY <br />� Application accepted on 10/02/01. <br />• 60-day review deadline on 12/O1/O1. <br />• Staff Review: Approval with conditions — l 1J14/O1. <br />• Planning Commission Recommendation: Denial w/findings — 11/14/O1. <br />2.0 BACKGROUND <br />2.1 On August 13, 1990 Mr. Hoff received a minor variance to allow construction of a <br />detached garage five feet from the front property line. The minor variance process (no <br />longer used by the City) required the signatures of adjacent property owners supporting <br />the variance being requested. Mr. Hoff did receive the necessary signatures and City <br />support for the 25-foot front yard setback encroachment. The minor variance site plan <br />(attached) included the other improvements that would occur on the property, including <br />the installation of a retaining wall and installation of a fence. However, the minor <br />variance approved by the City Council did not include an allowance for a 6-1/2 foot tall <br />fence. <br />2.2 In April 2001, the Community Development Department issued a building pernut to Mr. <br />Hoff for the replacement and expansion of his existing wood fence to the shoreline of <br />Lake McCarrons. However, this building permit was issued in enor. The inspector who <br />reviewed and issued the fence replacement/addition permit inadvertently overlooked <br />Section 1012.02B2 and its four foot maximum fence height allowance in a front yard. <br />Upon becoming aware of this error, the inspector notified the contractor of the height <br />limit for the section in the front yard. <br />PF3347 RCA 112601 Page 1 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.