My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_1126_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_1126_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 9:28:01 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:39:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7.4 The residents and the Planning Commission asked questions of the City Planner to clarify <br />history of the site, Code requirements, and the staff recommendation. Upon <br />consideration of the information provided at the hearing, the Commission concluded that <br />the request did not meet the necessary hardship test. <br />7.5 The Roseville Planning Commission voted (4-1) to recommended denial of the request <br />for a 2-1/2 foot variance to Section 1012.02B2 ofthe Roseville City Code to allow a <br />fence 6-1/2 feet in height in the front yard of property located at 1897 Shady Beach <br />Avenue, based on the following findings: <br />A. The property can be put to reasonable use under the official controls of the City. <br />A 4-foot tall fence can provide the privacy desired by the applicant, without <br />having a profound impact on the neighborhood. Landscape screening can be <br />installed to augment the 4-foot tall fence. <br />B. The property owner created the circumstance by his desire to construct a fence <br />taller than allowed by Code. A 6-1/2 foot tall fence does not provide any more <br />screening or blocking of potential headlight glare from Shady Beach Drive and <br />the neighboring driveway than a 4-foot tall fence. <br />C. The 6-1/2 foot tall fence does alter the essential character of this neighborhood. <br />8.0 SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br />8.1 Adopt a resolution to deny (approve or approve w/conditions) the request by Brad <br />Hoff for a 2-1/2 foot variance to Section 1012.02B2 of the Roseville City Code, based <br />on the findings of the Planning Commission (11/14/Ol). (and additional findings the <br />Council may wish to add into the record) <br />Prepared by: Thomas Paschke (490-2236) <br />Attachments: Property location map; site photo; proposed plans; draft resolution of denial. <br />Neighborhood letters/submissions form 11/14/O1 PC. Meeting. <br />Application received/accepted on October 2, 2001; 60-day review deadline on December 1, 2001. <br />PF3347 RCA 112601 Page 5 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.