My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_1217_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_1217_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 3:03:45 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:39:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes — 12/1 1/O1 <br />Page 2 <br />improvements. They sketched the currently approved plans for <br />transportation capital improvements in Roseville. <br />Bob Beneke, Consultant, North Metro I35W Corridor Coalition, a <br />multi jurisdictional effort, reviewed the connection between jobs <br />and transportation, especially within the I-35W corridor. He <br />compared and contrasted the theoretical carrying capacity of I- <br />35W, and the actual traffic counts there. He emphasized <br />functionality from a systems perspective. He reviewed several <br />redevelopment projects along the corridor. <br />Bloom discussed the Northeast Diagonal Land Use/Transit Study, a <br />multi jurisdictional effort, involving Hennepin and Ramsey <br />Counties, St. Paul, Minneapolis, Roseville, Vadnais Heights, <br />Shoreview, White Bear Township and White Bear Lake. She <br />described several economic development opportunity sites along <br />the corridor. <br />Arlene McCarthy, Director of Service Development, and Aaron <br />Isaacs, Facilities Development, Metro Transit, discussed experience <br />with the revised bus routes in Roseville, ridership, hours of <br />operation and fares. They also overviewed a transit proposal to <br />expand and enhance the transit hub at Rosedale. <br />Schwartz thanked a11 presenters and indicated staff would be back <br />with the City Council as projects came forward. <br />II. Regular 1�Ieeting <br />A. Communications and Public Comment <br />A-1 Dick Lambert made three requests relating to the ethics <br />investigation of his complaint: <br />1. Council should task the Ethics Commission with <br />recommending changes to the Ethics Resolution and <br />complaint process. <br />2. Should empower the Ethics Commission with subpoena <br />power. <br />3. Should revise the Roseville Ethics Resolution. <br />Mastel suggested that the Ethics Commission should review the <br />Ethics Resolution. Goedeke commented on the Ethics <br />Commission. Kysylyczyn responded that the City Council would <br />address this issue next year. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.