My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0114_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_0114_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 12:12:50 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:45:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Trunk Highway 280 Reconstruction <br />Issue Discussion <br />This issue discussion was originally brought to the Councils at the August 21 Work Session. <br />We have updated some of the items to reflect changes and make clarifications. <br />Citv of Roseville Issues <br />The initial plan the State proposed showed restricted access at both intersections, making them a <br />right-in/right-out condition. Only southbound traffic would have been able to access the Paper <br />Calmenson (PaCal) Site, and any traffic e�ting this site would only be able to e�t to the south, <br />This plan was brought to PaCal a year ago. The design was unacceptable to them for a number <br />of reasons. <br />PaCal contacted the City regarding their concerns about the proposal to cut off their access to <br />northbound 280. The function of their site revolves around transportation of goods with trucks, <br />and eliminating the northbound 280 access could be constituted as a taking. <br />The City started attending regular meetings with PaCal, Glen Van Wormer (a traffic engineer <br />with Short Elliot Hendrickson) and the State to discuss the different alternatives and work <br />through some of the issues. The group had come up with a plan that would allow PaCal to ha�e <br />full access at Broadway, and partial access at their North Driveway. This proposal was a"tight <br />diamond" interchange, with a right in/ right out at the north driveway. PaCal was comfortable <br />with this alternative; however, the new proposal would eliminate four to five houses in <br />Lauderdale. In order to determine if this was a viable alternative, the State contacted the <br />residents that live in the homes on the east side of this intersection to see how receptive they <br />would be to being bought out. <br />Redevelopment Potential <br />Staff evaluated the future redevelopment potential of the PaCal site. The site, due to its <br />pro�mity to NTinneapolis and visibility from I-3.SW, is ideal for a corporate campus <br />and/or mixed office/retail development. The current barriers to the redevelopment <br />include difficult access to the site. By providing a plan for improved and safe access at <br />Broadway and off of 280, the redevelopment potential and value of the site and the sites <br />in Lauderdale are significantly increased. It is estimated that the PaCal site (28 acres <br />controlled by one properry owner) could accommodate between 400,000 and 700,000 <br />square feet of new office, retail or corporate campus space. (It is currently zoned for <br />heavy industry (I-2) and is primarily used for materials handling and fabrications.) With <br />typical job ratios for new development this could mean 1,000 to 1,700 new jobs, with <br />over $30 million in annual payroll. This type of development could provide an <br />investment of $30 -$60 million in new value generating between $150,000 and $500,000 <br />in new taxes annually even with the changes in the recent state tax structure. In addition, <br />redevelopment would clean up the site and provide a much more appealing entry into <br />both communities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.