My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0408_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_0408_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 9:30:15 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:46:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
391
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION <br />Approval: <br />Date: 04/08/02 <br />Item: WS II. B. <br />Agenda Section: <br />WORK SESSION <br />Item Description: Presentation and Request by Outdoor Promotions, Inc. regarding Bus <br />Shelter installations and further interest from City Council <br />(P.F. 3389) <br />1.0 REQUESTED ACTION: <br />l.l Craig Piernot, Outdoor Promotions, Inc. (from Denver) will be at the City Council work <br />session to discuss proposed bus shelters along bus routes in Roseville and possibly <br />throughout the 35W Coalition Cities. The applicant is working throughout the Metro <br />Area on similar issues. Applicant and staff are seeking further direction from Council. <br />PROJECT REVIEW HISTORY: <br />. Application submitted on February, 2002 <br />. No 60 day requirement <br />. Staff Review: Approval with conditions — February and March, 2002 <br />. Planning Commission: Hearing/Recommendation needed — May/June, 2002 <br />. City Council: Action/Approval — June/July, 2002 <br />2.0 SUMMARY OF REQUESTS: <br />2.1 The Community Development Staff requests the Council provide direction on the <br />following issues: <br />a. Is there further interest in this program of low/no cost bus shelters? <br />b. Should the City work with the Coalition on an overall plan and implementation? <br />c. Should the City begin to update city codes in anticipation of this? <br />d. Should the City work on a contract with the provider/proponent? Must the City <br />solicit proposals or bids? <br />3.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: <br />3.1 Provide Council Direction. <br />Project specifics found on following pages. <br />Q: ComDev/Planning Files/PF3389/RCA9040802) <br />PF3389 RCA — 040802 Page 1 of 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.