Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />� <br />8 <br />9 <br />io <br />ii <br />1_7 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />2� <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />The e�sting 18 x 25 shed is larger than most one-car garages, in addition to the <br />proposed three-car garage. <br />Member Cunningham asked if an 860 sq.ft. structure was able to house three cars <br />(Yes). <br />Thomas Paschke explained allowable rear building area and, as an alternative, an <br />attached three-car garage which could be built without a variance. <br />Member Mulder stated the second building frustrated him. <br />Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Duncan, to <br />recommend approval of a 171 square foot variance from Section 1004.O1A4 <br />to allow construction of a detached accessory building 840 square feet in size <br />in the rear yard adjacent to the principal structure for property located at <br />1055 Shryer Avenue, based on the comments and findings in Section 4 and 5 <br />of the project report dated June 5, 2002. <br />Member Mulder noted that no other (third) accessory structure would be allowed. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Duncan, to <br />recommend approval of a conditional use permit to allow construction of a <br />30 foot by 28 foot (840 sq. ft.) detached accessory building (parcel total of <br />1,299 square feet) in the rear yard adjacent to the principal structure of <br />property located at 1055 Shryer Avenue, based on the comments and <br />findings in Section 4 and 5, and the conditions stipulated in Section 7 of the <br />project report dated June 5, 2002, and noted that no other (third) accessory <br />structure would be allowed. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />MOtlOn carried <br />