My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0617_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_0617_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 1:57:08 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:47:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />1 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />2� <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />S1 <br />Extract of Draft Minutes. Planning Commission Meeting. June 5, 2002: <br />d. Planning File 3399: Request by Robert Lindholm for a variance to <br />exceed the 30% lot coverage requirement of Section 1004.O1A6 of the <br />Roseville City Code for property located at 2959 Matilda Street. <br />Chairman Duncan opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas <br />Paschke provide a summary of the project report dated June 5, 2002. <br />Robert Lindholm has submitted an application for a 533 square foot or 5% <br />percent variance to Section 1004.0 lA6 (Ma�num Total Surface Area) to allow <br />the construction of a 864 square foot detached accessory structure (garage) in the <br />rear yard adjacent to the home and slightly expand the driveway by matching into <br />the e�sting driveway with a two foot wide by 24 foot wide (48 sq.ft.) apron. <br />The house was constructed in 1963 on the 90-foot by 122 foot or 10,980 square <br />foot parcel; the principal structure and tuck-under garage ha�e a footprint size <br />(based on applicant site plan information) of 55 feet by 25 feet or 1,375 square <br />feet. <br />The tuck under garage is estimated (City Staff� to be 16 feet deep by 25 feet wide <br />or 400 square feet and is proposed to be converted into living space. <br />Thomas Paschke explained the variance requirements and hardship on the site. <br />Staff recommended approval with conditions. <br />Member Mulder asked if there was discussion to narrow the driveway. If the <br />driveway had to be redone, a permit would be required. <br />Mr. Lindholm said the hardship is that he cannot park his current vehicles in the <br />tuck-under garage. <br />Member Peper asked for additional comments from adjoining neighbors (verbal <br />support only). <br />Member Mulder asked why the peak was oriented parallel to the north property <br />line (same as three other neighbors). <br />Member Cunningham asked for clarification on the amount of pa�ement. <br />There being no further discussion Chair Duncan closed the hearing. <br />Motion: Member Cunningham moved, seconded by Member Bakeman to <br />recommend approval of a 533 square foot (5%) variance to Section <br />1004.O1A6 of the Roseville City Code for Robert Lindholm, 2959 Matilda <br />Street, to allow total impervious surface coverage on the parcel to be 3,827 <br />sq. ft., subject to the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the <br />project report dated June 5, 2002. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.