Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />S <br />6 <br />1 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />1S <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />Extract of Draft 1�Tinutes, Planning Commission 1�Teeting. June 52002: <br />i. Plannin� File 3362: Request by Citv of Roseville for consideration of <br />proposed Ordinance amending Chapter 1016, of the City Code, relating <br />to shoreland and fence provisions. <br />Chairman Duncan opened the hearing and requested Community Development <br />Director Dennis Welsch provide a summary of the project report dated June 5, <br />2002. <br />The City has had a number of instances where fencing along shore lands has <br />come into question. Specifically, the issue of "why" fences are allowed along <br />shore land lots from the principle structure to the shore has been asked. <br />In the most recent case, the City Council interpreted the City Code to state that <br />no fencing shall be allowed shoreward of the principle structure and attached <br />deck The Council asked the staff to prepare an amendment and to establish a <br />hearing date with the Planning Commission (June 5, 2002) <br />Member Mulder asked for "hardship" definition for a fence. It will be a case-by- <br />case basis for this use, example being dog fencing and day care/safety fencing. <br />Could a 4' high chain link fence be permitted? <br />Chair Duncan explained that the right to install a privacy fence should be a <br />private right. <br />Member Cunningham said the fence would constrict a public resource. <br />Member Peper noted that in some developments fences are restricted to height <br />and color of cyclone fences. <br />Member Beckman asked if such fences currently exist in Roseville. <br />Thomas Paschke asked if an e�sting fence could be repaired (Yes). Thomas <br />Paschke asked if individual property owner notification should be done. <br />Member Mulder asked if other cities ha�e attempted to create an "appropriate" <br />fence. He is not comfortable with the current proposal. He encouraged staff to <br />come back with another option — a shorter chain link fence. <br />Member Cunningham asked for numbers of housing units that are closer than 75 <br />feet to the shoreline. <br />Member Bakeman stated that the option should be landscaping within 75 feet, <br />not fencing. <br />Member Peper found that consistency in fencing along property lines was <br />important. <br />