My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0722_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_0722_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 1:19:32 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:47:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Department Approval <br />Request for Council Action <br />Da�: 711�2 <br />It�'1 Nu�li1�':YI. c. <br />ager A proval Agenda Section <br />� '4�u�izatio� B� <br />Item Description: Bond Counsel, City Attorney, Development Attorney, Prosecuting <br />Attorney <br />Backnround <br />Last Monday, the City Council directed me to produce a summary of all the Responses to <br />the City's RFP for legal services, and to recommend four firms in each category of legal <br />service. <br />Summary of All Firms <br />The attached, four-page table summarizes the 17 proposals. <br />Recommendation <br />I cannot in good faith recommend firms at this point. Chris Miller, our Finance Director, <br />and his staff have not had a chance to interview the four firms interested in providing Bond <br />Counsel services. I have not interviewed the eight firms interested in providing City <br />Attorney services. Acting Police Chief Sletner and her staff have not had an opportunity to <br />interview the nine firms offering Prosecution services. In addition, staff have not spoken <br />with references supplied by the 17 law firms or with colleagues in other cities who may be <br />familiar with each firm's work. <br />Council Action Recommended <br />Allow affected staff an opportunity to interview the law firms that submitted proposals and <br />call references. <br />If the Council chooses to move forward without any staff interviews of law firms or reference <br />checking, then -- based solely on the written proposals -- I recommend Council interview <br />the following firms to provide the following services (firms listed in alphabetical order) : <br />Bond Counsel <br />1. Best 8y Flanagan <br />2. Briggs & Morgan <br />3. Dorsey 8v Whitney <br />4. Kennedy 8s Graven <br />Development Attorney <br />1. Briggs 8s Morgan <br />2. Campbell Knutson <br />3. Kennedy & Graven <br />4. Ratwik, Roszak 8v Maloney <br />City Attorney <br />1. Campbell Knutson <br />2. Jensen, Bell, Converse & Erickson <br />3. Kennedy $y Graven <br />4. Ratwik, Roszak 8v Maloney <br />Prosecuting Attorney <br />1. Campbell Knutson <br />2. Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs et al. <br />3. Jensen, Bell 8s Converse <br />4. Kelly 8� Fawcett <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.