My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0819_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_0819_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:00:16 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:48:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Summary of Position of� Briggs & Morgan; <br />- The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution <br />prohibits governmental entities from establishing a state religion. Conferring a benefit on a <br />religious institution has been interpreted as a violation of the First Amendment under <br />certain circumstances. Bond Counsel is of the opinion that Northwestern College is a <br />religiously �liated school, which is likely to be considered "pervasively sectarian" by a <br />court. Previous court rulings have stated that any benefit conferred on a"pervasively <br />sectarian" institution works to promote the establishment of religion. The `benefit' is <br />derived from the issuance of tax-exempt financing, which provides the institution with <br />lower borrowing costs than could be obtained otherwise. <br />The City's Bond Counsel acknowledges that recent court rulings support the argument that <br />a governmental entity can confer an indirect benefit to an institution even if it is <br />pervasively sectarian, as long as the facilities to be financed are not used for religious <br />purposes. In addition, recent court rulings have provided further support for government <br />participation in `faith-based' education. However, these rulings have dealt with benefits <br />granted to individuals who then applied the aid at a religiously affiliated institution. <br />Because the City would be lending the bond proceeds directly to Northwestern College, the <br />City's Bond Counsel does not think these rulings give it a legal basis to provide an <br />unqualified opinion with respect to the validity of the bonds issued. • <br />As was noted above, the City will be relying upon the legal opinion of separate Counsel as to the legality of <br />the bond issuance. With the exception noted above, Briggs & Morgan will be reviewing and/or preparing <br />a11 other legal documents with respect to this issue. The City Council is required to approve any issuance <br />of tax-exempt financing by the City. <br />There is no fiscal impact on the part of the City. All costs of debt issuance will be paid by the applicant. In <br />addition, the City does not intend to issue any direct debt in 2002. As a result, this issuance will not <br />jeopardize the "bank-qualification" Status of any new City debt issues. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff remains concerned with the need to obtain a legal opinion from a law firm other than the City's Bond <br />Counsel, which is a departure from past practices. However, if the Council is supportive of the public <br />purpose, and is comfortable with the opinion provided by other Counsel, the additional provisions noted <br />above should minimize any potential public exposure risk Staff recommends the Council set a public <br />hearing to consider the issuance of tax-exempt bonds for Northwestern College. <br />Council Action Requested <br />Motion to establish a public hearing for September 23, 2002, for the purposes of issuing up to $1 0,000,000 <br />in tax-exempt revenue bonds, for Northwestern College. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.