Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />S <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />zo <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />Extract of Draft 1�Tinutes from Planning Commission meeting of 9/4/02: <br />a. Plannin� File 3420: Request by James `��rede, 2078 Irene Street, for a <br />Variance to Section 1004A1A6 (Maximum Total Surface Area) of the <br />Roseville City Code to allow construction of an addition to the rear of <br />the home. <br />Chair Duncan opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke <br />provide a summary of the project report dated September 4 2002. <br />Thomas Paschke explained that James & Lucy Wrede submitted an application <br />for a 638 square foot variance to Section 1004.O1A6 (Ma�num Total Surface <br />Area) to allow major home improvements (dining room, porch large family <br />room, and second store addition) to their home at 2078 Irene Street. The Wrede <br />home was constructed in 1956 prior to the adoption of the current zoning section <br />to the City Code. <br />The proposed addition to the e�sting principal structure's footprint (dining room, <br />porch, and family room) adds 705 square feet to the e�sting footprint, causing <br />the parcel to be 638 square feet out of compliance with the 30% requirement of <br />Section 1004.01 A6. <br />Staff recommended approval of the variance with four conditions. Mr. Wrede <br />stated the staff report was acceptable. <br />There being no fnrther comments, Chair Duncan closed the hearing. <br />Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Peper, to <br />recommend approval of a 638 square foot (6%) variance to Section <br />1004.O1A6 of the Roseville City Code for James & Lucy `��rede , to allow <br />certain home and site improvements at 2078 Irene Street, based on the <br />�ndings in Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated <br />September 4, 2002. <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />This matter will be heard by the City Council on September 23, 2002. <br />