My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0923_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_0923_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 1:49:58 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:48:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes — 08/12/02 <br />Page 12 <br />IV. Land Use <br />�'• Reports and Recommendations Reports and <br />Recommendations <br />A. Selection of an Arona Developer Subject to Certain Arona Developer <br />Conditions <br />City Manager Beets reviewed the proposed project <br />schedule in the staff inemorandum dated August 12, <br />2002 for Project PF 3243, and asked that as part of their <br />choice of a preliminary developer, another condition be <br />that the developer be able to accommodate the <br />development time frame as it related to land bids and <br />other outstanding elements of the proposal. <br />Councilmembers once again reviewed their preferences <br />for selection of a developer. <br />Councilmember Maschka selected United Properties — <br />Roseville Churches Coalition, with MetroPlains as his <br />second choice, and reiterated his rationale, and spoke to <br />public comments. <br />Councilmember Klausing concurred in selecting United <br />Properties as his first choice, deferred comment on a <br />second choice at this time, and spoke to public <br />comments. <br />Councilmember Schroeder again expressed his <br />appreciate of the proposals received from all ten (10) <br />developers, and thanked staff for their preliminary time <br />in selecting four (4) for Council consideration. <br />Councilmember Schroeder stated that, upon his review <br />of the original project goals, each of the proposals <br />demonstrated those goals with differing options. <br />Councilmember Schroeder selected the United Properties <br />proposal as his first choice for its housing affordability, <br />and transitions in residential and commercial areas <br />related to the existing neighborhood. Councilmember <br />Schroeder chose MetroPlains as his second choice. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.