2002_0930_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

6.10 This development project is located within the Rice Creek Watershed and its grading and drainage plan must be reviewed to receive certain permits by the Watershed. Further, the Roseville Engineering Department must review and approve these plans as well to ensure consistency with Rice Creek's approval and the City Code requirements. 6.11 The final plat must include a utility and drainage easement around the periphery which is ten-feet in width (where no matching easement is available). 6.12 Utility services (City water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer) will be provided from existing services within the County Road B right-of-way. Final locations of hydrants will be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshall prior to the issuance of permits. The proposed (revised) plan indicates a pond design modification that allows the pond to spread out creating a shallower design. Catch basins have been added to address storm water issues on adjacent properties, and their design is that of a rectangular infiltration area, as requested by Rice Creek Watershed. The sanitary sewer has remained the same as initially proposed and appears to be adequate. The developer will be responsible for the installation of all utilities and a Metro SAC (sewer availability charge) of $1,200 per unit. 6.13 The Roseville Park & Recreation Commission recommended that the City accept a payment in lieu of land dedication for the Stonecrest development. This cash payment to the city amounts to $400.00 per lot or $8,800.00. 6.14 On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, the developer met with property owners directly adjacent to the development to review the proposed landscape plan. At the meeting residents commented about the final design and its improved open space and the landscaping around the periphery. The current plan is in the process of being revised based on comments received from the meeting. 6.15 The landscape plan should be a working plan, which is field inspected and modified to address utility line, slope, and view line issues. Field marking should take place to properly address neighboring property owner screening concerns, which may require (with permission) planting of trees on private property. The home owner association will be responsible for all maintenance and irrigation. 6.16 A fmal tree preservation plan and tree markings should be completed and be reviewed and approved by the City Staf£ This plan should plan be a working plan that attempts as best as possible to save all trees indicated an identified in the field. Modifications (loss of trees) may take place to address pro�mity to structures and construction activity. PF3417 — RCA Final Development Plan 093002 Page 8