Laserfiche WebLink
5.0 PLANNING CO�I�IISSION RECO�I�IENDATION <br />On October 2, 2002, the Planning Commission reviewed the annual IUP report <br />on the Agness/Schorn case and recommended 3-2 as follows: <br />The City has received three types of comments from neighbors: 1) Fix the damaged fence <br />and 2) maintain the front, side, and back yard, 3) no change in comprehensive plan or <br />zoning should be approved. No comments or reports ha�e been submitted by police, tire, <br />or building inspection. The Commission expressed concern that Agness/Schorn did not <br />spend more time to resolve the "snow plow damaged fence" issue as a private issue <br />between property owners. <br />�aet�r Duncan moved, seconded by Member Pepper to recommend approval <br />to the City Council (regarding conformance with the conditions of the IUP and <br />continuance of the Agness/Schorn Interim Use Permit), but also that the City not offer the <br />Borders and Buffers program as a fence solution. <br />Ayes: 3. Duncan, Bakeman, Peper <br />Nays: 2, Stone, Traynor <br />Motion carried <br />6.0 SUGGESTED ACTION <br />6.1 Hear public comment. <br />6.2 By motion approve the IUP as in conformance with the conditions of the <br />permit and approve continuance of the Agness/Schorn Interim Use Permit, <br />with an annual report to be presented again in October, 2003. <br />Report by: Dennis Welsch 490-2232 <br />Attachment: email from neighbor <br />Agness/Schorn NP Review, PF 3329 RCA ( 10 1402) Page S <br />