My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_1021_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_1021_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:00:31 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:49:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TWIN LAKES BACKGROUND REPORT (10/21/02) <br />REQUEST: <br />Property owners, Northco Real Estate, St Paul Properties, Hagen, and Reco/Regan <br />have requested that the City Council/Planning Commission discuss the merits of <br />either: <br />1) not rezoning any Twin Lakes land to B-6 until a redevelopment proposal is <br />in hand, or <br />2) expanding the ��pre-existing, nonconforming use" text de�nition and <br />exceptions for their land uses and buildings within the proposed Twin Lakes <br />`B-6" rezoning area. <br />The applicants' purpose would be to allow "pre-existing, nonconforming lots, uses <br />and structures" to expand, intensify, or change to another "nonconforming" use in <br />order to stabilize the lease and cash flow as well as retain or expand existing and <br />new tenants. <br />In July 2002, the City Council requested that the Planning Commission review the <br />case and provide further recomn�endations regarding the `pre-existing non <br />conforming lots, uses and structures': Since July the applicants have been working <br />with staff� and the City Attorney to develop more e�licit language dealing with the <br />"non-conformittg use" issue. At the same time they have pointed out other areas in the <br />ordinance where clarification was necessary. Attached are their proposals. <br />1.0 BACKGROUND: <br />1.1 In September of 2001, the City of Roseville established in its Comprehensive Plan a <br />"Business Park" designation. The Twin Lakes Business Park Master Plan was approved <br />with that designation. On October 24, 2001, the Metropolitan Council approved the <br />designation of "Business Parl�' within the Twin Lakes Master Plan Amendment to the <br />City of Roseville Comprehensive Plan. The Commission formally reviewed this item on <br />November 14, 2001. <br />1.2 During the fa11 of 2001 the Community Development Department reviewed the Roseville <br />Zoning Ordinance to determine whether it was preferable to create a separate zoning <br />district for Twin Lakes or revise the e�sting district. The staff concluded that the <br />e�sting (at that time) B-6, Office Park District could be amended with the new language <br />consistent with a mixed-use business park such as Twin Lakes. <br />1.3 A"NTixed Use Business Park District" is defined as a geographically identifiable area <br />which contains a consistent architectural mix of office, office-laboratory, office- <br />showroom-warehousing bio-technical, biomedical, high-tech software and hardware <br />production uses with support services such as limited or specialized retail, health, fitness, <br />lodging and multifamily housing Most of these uses can be connected by pedestrian way <br />as well as roadway. <br />PF3359-RCA(102102) Page 3 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.