2002_1021_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSSION MINUTES OCTOBER, 02, 2002 e. Planning File 3459: Request by the City of Roseville to consider amended text in the B-6 Business Park District (Section 1005.07) pertaining to pre-existing non-conforming uses. Chair Duncan opened the hearing and request City Planner Thomas Paschke provide a summary of the project report dated October 2, 2002. Dennis Welsch informed the Commission that properiy owners, Northco Real Estate, St Paul Properties, Hagen, and Reco/Regan requested that the City CounciUPlanning Commission discuss the merits of either: 1) not rezoning any Twin Lakes land to B-6 until a redevelopment proposal is in hand, or 2) expanding the "pre-e�sting, nonconforming use" te�t definition and exceptions for their land uses and buildings within the proposed Twin Lakes `B-6" rezoning area. The applicants' purpose would be to a11ow "pre-e�sting, nonconforming lots, uses and structures" to expand, intensify, or change to another "nonconforming" use in order to stabilize the lease and cash flow as well as retain or expand e�sting and new tenants. In 7uly 2002, the City Council requested that the Planning Commission review the case and provide further recommendations regarding the "pre-e�sting non conforming lots, uses and structures". Since 7uly the applicants ha�e been working with staff and the City Attorney to develop more explicit language dealing with the "non-conforming use" issue. At the same time they ha�e pointed out other areas in the ordinance where clarification was necessary. Attached are their proposals. Da�e Sellegrin, attorney representing the properry owners, stated the owners support the staff proposal to table te�t changes for attorney review, table indefinitely the B-6 map rezoning until properiy owners come forth; and staff to develop a policy explaining the procedure for review of pre-e�sting non-conforming uses. Chair Duncan closed the hearing. Motion: Member Pepper moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend Any Planning Commission recommendation on language changes to the B-6 zoning district be tabled until November 4, 2002, and that the City Attorney and staff are to retain the e�sting pre- existing, nonconformity language, and further that the City Attorney and staff are to prepare specific clarification language for Section 1005.07A and B regarding "permitted uses and ancillary uses". Member Traynor stated he will support the motion, change has been planned for 15 years, but the City must get moving on the site. The market will still drive the development on the site and that the City should encourage redevelopment of Twin Lakes. PF3359-RCA(102102) Page 9 of 13