My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_1021_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_1021_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:00:31 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:49:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />56 <br />b. Planning FYIe 3430: Request by Mack Mead for a 13.5 foot Variance to Section <br />1004.02.D4 of the Roseville City Code to allow construction of certain home and attached <br />garage improvements at 388 So. McCarrons Boulevard. <br />Chair Duncan opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke provide a summary <br />of the project report dated October 2 2002. <br />Mr. Paschke indicated Mack Mead submitted a proposal to complete certain home improvements <br />to his e�sting home at 388, South McCarrons Boulevard. These improvements include the <br />addition of a second stall to the e�sting tuck-under garage with living area above, creating another <br />bedroom <br />Any proposed addition to the Westem Avenue portion of the structure, such as adding a stall to the <br />garage and living space above, would require a variance. The Meade's current situation would be <br />classified by the Community Development Department as a pre-existing non-conforming use. <br />Based on the information provided and the findings in Section 5 of the project report dated <br />October 2, 2002, staff recommends approval of a 1.5 foot variance for the garage to Section <br />1004.O1A11 and a 13.5 foot variance for the living area above the garage to Section 1004.02D4 of <br />the Roseville City Code for Mack Meade to allow principal structure and site improvements at 388 <br />South McCarrons Boulevard West, subject to the following conditions: <br />a.The applicant locating the parcePs properry pins and verifying the location of the e�sting <br />principal structure, thus allowing the Community Development Department to verify the distance <br />required for the setback variance. <br />b.The principal structure being limited to an addition of no more than nine feet, as indicated on the <br />submitted site plan. <br />c.The i�stallation of roof gutters to properly direct roof drainage away from the adjacent <br />properties. <br />d.The review and approval of a building permit consistent with the approved plans and variance. <br />The house was constructed in 1957, before all current codes. The slope of the site is the major <br />reason for the variance. The house currently does not meet the side comer lot setback. <br />Staff recommended approval, with four conditions, as indicated in the staff report dated October 2, <br />2002. <br />Mr. Mead stated the staff report was adequate and accurate. <br />There was no further public comment. Chair Duncan closed the hearing. <br />Motion: Motion by Member Pepper, seconded by Member Stone, to <br />recommend approval of a 1.5 foot variance for the garage to section 1004.O1A11 and a 13.5 foot <br />variance for the living area above the garage to Section 1004.02D4 of the Roseville City Code for <br />Mack Meade, to allow certain home and site improvements at 388 South McCarrons Boulevard <br />West, based on the findings in Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated <br />October 2, 2002. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.