Laserfiche WebLink
C. The variance, ifgranted, will not alter the essential character of the locality <br />The improvements proposed will create a home that fits well into is current <br />surroundings and one that has minimal impact on adjacent properties. The <br />Community Development Staff has determined that variances, if granted, <br />will not alter the essential character of the locality, nor adversely affect the <br />public health, safety, or general welfare, of the city or adjacent properties. <br />6.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br />6.1 Based on the information provided and the findings in Section 5 of this project report, <br />staff recommends approval of a 52 square foot (<1%) variance to Section 1004.O1A6 and <br />two 26 foot variances to Section 1004.02D5 of the Roseville City Code, to a11ow <br />construction of a home on property addressed as 458 South McCarrons Boulevard, <br />subject to the following conditions: <br />A Setbacks established for this parcel of : Front Yard (Woodruff Avenue) — 4 feet; <br />Rear Yard or Street Side Yard (South McCarrons Boulevard) — 4 feet; Side Yard <br />(east) 5 feet. <br />B Both driveways being constructed with a paved, a11 weather surface. <br />C The deck being located a minimum of two feet from the north (South McCarrons <br />Boulevard) properiy line. <br />D The parcel being limited to a maximum impervious surface coverage of 3,53 1 <br />square feet. <br />E Submittal of a revised site & grading plan consistent with these conditions and <br />one that addresses proper management of storm water run-off. <br />F The review and approval of a building permit consistent with the approved plans <br />and variance. <br />� . 0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: <br />7.1 On December 4, 2002, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing <br />regarding the Van Sickle request. At this hearing an adjacent property owner addressed <br />the Commission indi � ng his support for the variances and the development of the <br />property. <br />�. 2 NIr. Van Sickle addressed the Commission further elaborating on the difficulties in <br />developing the parcel with a home and to seek information regarding responsibility for <br />the retaining wa11 located within the public right-of-way. `Deb Bloom indicated that staff <br />would review the retaining wall issue and provide a response to Mr. Van Sickle. <br />PF3447 - RCA 121602 - Page 5 of 6 <br />