My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_1216_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_1216_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:32:07 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:49:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.0 PROJECT SPECIFICS: <br />4.1 Grace Church Roseville desires replacement of two existing ground signs on the <br />premises. One of the ground signs is located within the County Road B2 right-of-way, <br />while the other ground sign lies 3 feet from the property line adjacent to Hamline Avenue. <br />4.2 Both signs would be replaced with metal ground sign 7 feet ta11 and 6 feet wide and <br />comprised of a lettering area not exceeding the 50 square feet required by Section <br />1009.04B of the city Code (see attached sign). <br />4.3 The two signs identify the church and school and each is generally located near an access <br />for the premises. The sign that lies along County Road B2 must be moved outside the <br />street right-of-way, which new location will be further east and in front of the new <br />addition (currently under construction). The sign that lies along Hamline Avenue would <br />be replaced in the same location or three feet from the western property line. <br />4.4 Both sign locations have existing topographic issues to overcome. Most notably, the <br />grade change along Hamline Avenue (dropping down to parking lot) makes it nearly <br />impossible to place a sign at the required setback and maximum height, without <br />compnsing the signs visibility and placing it within an e�sting parking space. Similarly, <br />the C�iunty Road B2 sign has grade issues (rising from the properiy line to <br />structure/parting lot) that limit placement, and the required storm water pond takes up an <br />ideal location. E�sting mature trees also complicate matters for both locations. <br />4.5 Section 1009.03M requires ground signs to be set back �/z the distance of a pylon sign or <br />15 feet from a property line. <br />5.0 STAFF FINDINGS: <br />5.1 Section 1013.02 states: Where there are practical difficulties or unusual hardships in the <br />way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this code, the city council shah <br />have the power, in a specific case and after notice and public hearings, to vary any such <br />provision in harmony with the general purpose and intent thereof and may impose such <br />additional conditions as it considers necessary so that the public health, safety, and <br />general welfare may be secured and substantial justice done. <br />5.2 Under State Statute 462.357, subd. 6(2) provides authority for the city to "hear requests <br />for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their strict <br />enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the <br />individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance <br />means the properiy in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances <br />unique to the properiy not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not <br />PF3446 - RCA 121602 • Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.