My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_1216_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_1216_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:32:07 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:49:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Extract of 1�Tinutes of Planning Commission meeting of 12/04/02: <br />b. Plannin� File 3446: A request by Grace Church for a Variance to Section 1009.03M <br />(Ground Signs) of the Roseville City Code to allow the replacement of two ground signs <br />(one adjacent to Hamline Avenue and one adjacent to County Road B2) on the premises. <br />Chair Duncan opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke provide a <br />summary of the project report dated December 4, 2002. <br />Grace Church Roseville has applied for a variance on each of its e�sting ground signs. One sign <br />currently lies within the County Road B2 right-of-way and the other, lies three feet from the <br />property line adjacent to Hamline Avenue. This request seeks a variance of 15 feet and 12 feet, <br />respectively, to the required 15 foot setback. <br />Both sign locations ha�e e�sting topographic issues to overcome. Most notably, the grade <br />change along Hamline Avenue (dropping down to parking lot) makes it nearly impossible to <br />place a sign at the required setback and maximum height, without comprising the signs visibility <br />and placing it within an e�sting parking space. Similarly, the County Road B2 sign has grade <br />issues (rising from the property line to structure/parting lot) that limit placement, and the required <br />storm water pond takes up an ideal location. E�sting mature trees also complicate matters for <br />both locations. Staff recommended approval of both sign variances. <br />Douglas Fruist, 2966 Hamline Avenue, expressed concern about the spotlight on the Hamline <br />Avenue sign shining in motorist's eyes. <br />Member Mulder asked the applicant to review lighting alternatives with the City staff. Member <br />Stone asked for the design, noting the sign goes directly to the ground. <br />There being no further comments, Chair Duncan closed the hearing. <br />Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend approval of a <br />15 foot variance to Section 1009.03M of the Roseville City Code to replace a sign along County <br />Road B2 and a 12 foot variance to Section 1009.03M of the Roseville City Code to replace a sign <br />along Hamline Avenue, both for Grace Church Roseville, 13 10 County Road B2, based on the <br />findings in Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated December 4, 2002. <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.