CC_Minutes_2010_0927 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, September 27, 2010 Page 16 couraged respect of the Lot Split Committee and their recommendations, not the proposed 9,500 foot minimum lot size as is currently proposed by staff. Carolyn Silflow, 2230 Marion Road Ms. Silflow spoke in support of Councilmember Ihlan's proposed ordinance lan- guage for maintaining larger lot neighborhoods; opining that the large lots and trees mitigated the noise and air pollution of nearby major roadways. Robert Venters, 1964 Fairview Mr. Venters addressed the fairness issue; and noted resident concerns for their ex- pectations when moving to Roseville and potential changes. Mayor Klausing thanked the public for their comments; and questioned further action. Councilmember Ihlan advised that when the zoning code came before the City Council she would offer this as an amendment for a vote. g. Consider a Minor Subdivision Creating Three Residential Parcels from the Two Existing Parcels at 3077 and 3091 Fairview Avenue (PF07 -054) Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon briefly reviewed the request for a MINOR SUBDIVISION creating a total of three residential parcels for a single existing parcel; previously heard at a Public Hearing at the City Council level on June 28, 2010, and subsequent TEXT AMENDMENT to the City's mi- nor subdivision ordinance to address concerns. Mr. Trudgeon noted that this subdivision was based on current minimum lot sizes of 11,000 square feet. Mr. Trudgeon noted emergency access concerns and subsequent resolution by staff; existing garage to be removed as a condition of approval. Councilmember lhlan expressed concern that no additional notice had been pro- vided to neighbors on tonight's meeting who may not be aware of tonight's meet- ing. Mayor Klausing noted that public comment had been expressed at their last meet- ing. Public Comment Mr. Bakke Mr. Bakke noted that this subdivision was a perfect example for consideration of future conceptual zoning. Mayor Klausing spoke in support of this request; and distinguished legal com- pliance and application of existing legislation versus drafting legislation based on public comment.