My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_0927
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_0927
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2010 11:08:52 AM
Creation date
11/1/2010 11:08:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/27/2010
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
If the current record of environmental review reveals such problems as would indicate that a permit <br /> should simply not be granted, immediately denying the permit saves time and money for everyone —the <br /> company making the proposal, the MPCA staff, the City of Roseville staff, and the Roseville taxpayers. <br /> Bituminous Roadways has publicly stated that "if the city does not approve Bituminous Roadways' the <br /> permit application for outdoor storage, the plans for the plant will not continue." <br /> For all these reasons, l respectfully request that the Roseville City Council consider the asphalt plant <br /> proposal in Tight environmental review record already developed during the EAW and air quality permit <br /> processes, together with the issues for consideration of a Conditional Use Permit and the Performance <br /> Standards in the Roseville Zoning Code for Industrial Areas. If the Council finds that this proposal should <br /> not go forward, I respectfully request that they so find and make a decision as quickly as possible. <br /> Thank you, <br /> VA <br /> Tam McGehee <br /> II <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.