My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_0927
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_0927
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2010 11:08:52 AM
Creation date
11/1/2010 11:08:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/27/2010
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 27, 2010 <br /> Page 7 <br /> consideration of possible locations, with a strong community interest in locating a <br /> community center in the vicinity of the City Campus. <br /> Mr. Schroeder noted that the park and recreation system is seen by residents as an <br /> essential service in the Roseville community. <br /> Mr. Schroeder briefly reviewed implementation directions; referendum proposals; <br /> cost estimates; implantation strategy with final cost estimates and projections <br /> from small to large scale; and the interest of the existing CAT in seeing a similar <br /> process move forward as implementation strategies are imposed, including a <br /> community survey. <br /> Mr. Schroeder reviewed the next steps, with the CAT unanimously agreeing that <br /> the next steps are critical to their goals of improving the system, and urged a <br /> thoughtful and comprehensive assessment of implementation methods; with many <br /> members of the CAT expressing interest in continuing their efforts as implemen- <br /> tation strategies are formulated; with that process scheduled to begin this fall with <br /> recommendations proposed by the spring of 2011. Mr. Schroeder advised that a <br /> statistically -valid survey is likely to be a component of the next phase of planning <br /> Mayor Klausing thanked all participants involved in the process of this compre- <br /> hensive look at the City's park and recreation system; opining that the report was <br /> a lot to digest. <br /> Discussion among Mr. Schroeder, Mr. Brokke and Councilmembers included <br /> specifics and practicalities of linking various facilities and their functions in con- <br /> cern with the City's Public Works Department to create a circuit, possibly as sim- <br /> ple as signage or sidewalks, or other public improvements, evidenced by each <br /> park's planning worksheet, an example of which was included in the Appendix. <br /> Further discussion included potential future referendum; statistically valid survey <br /> proposed for February of 2011, not currently included in the proposed 2011 budg- <br /> et; potential costs for implementation; and sector worksheets included in the Ap- <br /> pendix identifying components anticipated in each sector and constellation. <br /> Mayor Klausing requested that page numbers be incorporated into the next draft; <br /> and Councilmember Roe requested that the color code keys be included on each <br /> page for easier navigation in future drafts. <br /> Additional discussion included how involved adjacent neighbors were in the <br /> process depending on their location and the multiple opportunities provided for <br /> receiving their input; and repeated comments that the City maintains existing fa- <br /> cilities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.