My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_1011
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_1011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2010 9:30:36 AM
Creation date
11/2/2010 9:30:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/11/2010
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 11, 2010 <br /> Page 13 <br /> Mr. Paschke advised that the City could not base their denial solely on health is- <br /> sues for telecommunication antenna, as that is regulated by the Federal Commu- <br /> nications Commission (FCC) and applicants were required to seek permits specif- <br /> ically from the FCC. <br /> Discussion included interpretations of zoning code (Section 1013.10) for Industri- <br /> al and Business Districts, as well as permitted uses in residential neighborhoods; <br /> and different land use parameters established by Planned Unit Development <br /> (PUD) Agreements beyond those provided in zoning code. <br /> The applicant was present, but had no comment. <br /> Klausing moved, Johnson seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 10850 (Attach- <br /> ment F) entitled, "A Resolution Approving an Amendment to the EagleCrest <br /> Planned Unit Development, 2925 -2945 Lincoln Drive (PF10 -022); to allow Eag- <br /> leCrest Senior Housing LLC the installation of additional freestanding and flush <br /> mounted telecommunication equipment on their campus. <br /> Councilmember Ihlan spoke in opposition to the motion, opining that there was <br /> no basis for this permitted use under City Code, and at a minimum, it would re- <br /> quire a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Johnson and Klausing. <br /> Nays: Ihlan. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> d. Consider Approving the Request by United Properties for the PLAT for a <br /> Senior Cooperative Residence at 2008 2010 Cleveland Avenue <br /> City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the request of United Properties for ap- <br /> proval of a PLAT to allow the proposed senior cooperative residence at 3008- <br /> 3010 Cleveland Avenue to be developed in two phases, consistent with the devel- <br /> opment approval as detailed in the RCA dated October 11, 2010; and dividing the <br /> land into three specific lots for phased construction. <br /> Mr. Paschke clarified that tonight's action was specific to approve the plat and lot <br /> lines; and that if and when the assisted living phase of the project came forward, <br /> the Outlot and lots to the south would then need to be developed, and a new plat <br /> created to house the assisted living project, and that it would then have to meet all <br /> terms and conditions as required by the City Council. <br /> Discussion included non existence of any underlying zoning; phasing of the <br /> project and the approval process for each. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.