My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_1011
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_1011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2010 9:30:36 AM
Creation date
11/2/2010 9:30:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/11/2010
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 11, 2010 <br /> Page 6 <br /> 9. General Ordinances for adoption <br /> a. Consider an Ordinance Amending Roseville City Code, Section 1007.015 <br /> Title 10, Zoning Regulations, to Include a List of Prohibited Uses within all <br /> Industrial Districts <br /> Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon briefly reviewed the pro- <br /> posed ordinance amendment and prohibition of certain uses in Chapter 1007 In- <br /> dustrial Districts as detailed in the RCA dated October 11, 2010. Mr. Trudgeon <br /> reviewed various goals and policies of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan in the Land <br /> Use, Economic Development, and Environmental Protection Chapters emphasiz- <br /> ing the need for land use and development that is sensitive to and protective of the <br /> City's environmental quality, natural amenities and aesthetics. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon noted the list of prohibited uses proposed for amendment (Attach- <br /> ment B) and significant discussion raised throughout the process for potential al- <br /> ternatives. Mr. Trudgeon advised that staff continued to review those alternatives <br /> with merit for integration into the new zoning code still under development. Mr. <br /> Trudgeon noted the discussion held at the Planning Commission Public Hearing <br /> and concerns expressed by dissenting members, not with the prohibited uses <br /> listed, but whether the list was inclusive to all potential prohibitive uses that could <br /> come up in the future.. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Ihlan, Mr. Trudgeon confirmed that the written <br /> list of prohibited uses suggested by Dick Lambert, Chairman of the Roseville Cit- <br /> izens League dated October 5, 2010, would be integrated in the Use Chart as ap- <br /> propriate and modified accordingly. <br /> Councilmember Ihlan noted two blanks in the chart (Attachment B) related to or- <br /> namental iron work; with Mr. Trudgeon noting this was an oversight on staff's <br /> part, as well as related ordinance language that would be corrected before final <br /> draft and would be signified as "NP" for a non permitted use. <br /> Councilmember Ihlan suggested clarifying the Use Chart by removing double <br /> negatives on the chemical use portion. Mr. Trudgeon noted that this had been <br /> brought to staff's attention previously as part of the process and that the correc- <br /> tion would be incorporated as part of the new zoning code language. <br /> Mayor Klausing requested that the City Attorney speak to affects the proposed <br /> ordinance amendment could have on pending applications. <br /> City Attorney Charles Bartholdi advised that, under MN State Law in zoning cas- <br /> es, recent interpretations had indicated that no developer rights exist until con- <br /> struction of improvements are underway, with numerous cases supporting this in- <br /> terpretation. Mr. Bartholdi noted that there were several cases where a developer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.