My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_1011
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_1011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2010 9:30:36 AM
Creation date
11/2/2010 9:30:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/11/2010
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 11, 2010 <br /> Page 8 <br /> Klausing opined that at this point, it was premature to determine what the City <br /> Council's action or response would be. <br /> Ms. McGehee opined that the City's existing performance standards were suffi- <br /> cient, and further opined that those highlighted on the proposed Use Table were <br /> less enforceable than those already in place. Ms, McGehee noted exceptions not <br /> currently addressed on the proposed Use Table, including that of a nuclear plant, <br /> nuclear waste storage facility, or a refuse burner. Ms. McGehee opined that the <br /> original asphalt plant application had provided a misconception and that it should <br /> have been brought forward before the CUP came forward. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon clarified that the fuel tank addressed by Ms. McGehee was not part <br /> of the original application for staff review, but had been added by the applicant <br /> given the nature of the MPCA environmental review process as part of a future <br /> consideration. <br /> Vivian Ramalingam, 2182 Acorn Road <br /> Ms. Ramalingam expressed concern with lists being problematic if standards are <br /> formulated broadly and applicable to any situation. <br /> Steve Dorff, Meritex, representative, business owner on the west side <br /> Mr. Dorff expressed opposition to anything that would further hindrance business <br /> marketing and redeveloping land; allowing for job growth. Mr. Dorff opined that <br /> the Industrial Zoning should continue as currently outlined and in the former mas- <br /> ter plan for the industrial area. <br /> Greg Korstad, Attorney for Bituminous Roadways, Inc. <br /> Larkin Hoffman Daly Lindgren, Ltd. <br /> Mr. Korstad spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance changes, as outlined in <br /> written comments, provided as a bench handout, and attached hereto and made a <br /> part thereof <br /> Mr. Korstad, while in partial agreement with City Attorney Bartholdi on the gen- <br /> eral rule under State law, opined that there was sufficient case law supporting <br /> such a change in ordinance in the middle of an application process, creating ma- <br /> nifest injustice for the applicant, and that this application would meet that excep- <br /> tion to the general rule. <br /> Megan Dushin, 2249 St. Stephen Street <br /> Ms. Dushin sought clarification on issues discussed prior to her arrival at to- <br /> night's meeting related to the previous asphalt plant application and the ordinance <br /> amendments currently before the City Council at tonight's meeting, which were <br /> addressed by Mayor Klausing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.