My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_1018
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_1018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2010 9:44:50 AM
Creation date
11/2/2010 9:44:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/18/2010
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 18, 2010 <br /> Page 5 <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Pust; Roe; Ihlan; and Johnson <br /> Nays: None. <br /> 8. Consider Items Removed from Consent <br /> 9. General Ordinances for adoption <br /> a. Consider an Ordinance Amending Roseville City Code, Section 302.12 relat- <br /> ing to Alcohol Service in Specific Areas at the Skating Center <br /> Parks and Recreation Director Lonnie Brokke briefly reviewed the request for the <br /> sale of intoxicating liquor outside of the community rooms but within areas of <br /> controlled access at the Guidant John Rose Minnesota OVAL as detailed in the <br /> Request for Council Approval (RCA) dated October 18, 2010. <br /> Councilmember Ihlan noted that language addressed in line 5 of the staff memo, <br /> was not included in the language of the proposed ordinance about controlled <br /> access. <br /> City Attorney Bartholdi advised that such language could be added to line 14 of <br /> the draft ordinance. <br /> Councilmember Ihlan spoke in support of such amended language. <br /> Councilmember Pust noted that line 19 of the red -lined proposed ordinance (At- <br /> tachment A) indicated that a liquor license could be issued by the City or by an <br /> adjacent municipality; and questioned how the license could be controlled by a <br /> different municipality who may not have the same liquor control standards in <br /> place. <br /> City Attorney Bartholdi noted that the language was parallel to MN State Statute, <br /> with the City or adjacent cities able to license the holder. <br /> Discussion included this provision to allow for caterers to be licensed by adjacent <br /> municipalities while serving alcohol in Roseville; and examples of other caterers <br /> operating in Roseville, but not licensed for alcohol sales by the City. <br /> Councilmember Pust suggested, and Councilmembers concurred, that when the <br /> overall liquor ordinance comes up for review, this provision needed to be re- <br /> viewed to ensure adjacent communities have similar standards to which their li- <br /> censees are held; and noted that when City personnel are patrolling a large event, <br /> the only revenue source available for those services was paid through license fees. <br /> Councilmember Roe further suggested, during overall review of the ordinance, in <br /> addition to establishing rules for service of alcohol in the facility, it may be more <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.