My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-09-28_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
2010-09-28_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2010 2:13:46 PM
Creation date
11/4/2010 2:13:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/28/2010
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
water mains and their sizes and flow rates; replacement of all cast iron 6 -8" water <br />mains during reconstruction projects as a cost effective consideration; and new <br />technologies being developed. <br />Mr. Schwartz reported that the City of Roseville is being considered for a pilot <br />project with the 3M Company to test a new water lining product they've recently <br />developed and tested in Europe for several years and now available in the United <br />States, and their willingness to line 2,000 feet at their cost, provided the City do <br />the excavation work. <br />Mr. Schwartz noted staff's anticipation of receiving favorable bids on various seal <br />coat projects, based on combining with projects in other communities, providing <br />for larger quantities and economics of scale. <br />9. 2011 City Manager Recommended Budget <br />Mr. Schwartz highlighted the Public Works portion of the City Manager's <br />recommended 2011 budget and City Council ranking of programs and services in <br />tax supported funds; with a five percent (5 proposed increase in the <br />Preliminary Levy. Mr. Schwartz reviewed challenges in maintaining necessary <br />funding in light of ongoing state cuts; new mandated budget expenses as detailed <br />in the staff report dated September 28, 2010; and major personnel expenses, <br />including wages and benefits, with the exception of the Public Works budgeted <br />personnel expenses at 18% versus that of public safety at 85 <br />Mr. Schwartz briefly reviewed the ongoing process to achieve program -based <br />budgeting and individual and composite rankings. Mr. Schwartz encouraged <br />members to offer their feedback to staff prior to final budget and levy adoption. <br />Discussion included reductions in maintenance of City Hall, with PWET <br />Commission members expressing concern in reducing custodial costs #85) with <br />higher paid engineering staff providing those services rather than using their <br />expertise as needed; duties incorporated into organizational management #76); <br />staff hours in supporting various Commissions and their related budgets; and <br />difficulties in PWET Commission review of the budget based on their limited <br />information. <br />Members concurred that, in order to make informed recommendations, it would <br />be helpful to obtain additional information on what each line item encompassed <br />and those areas that are sustainable and those that are not. <br />Chair DeBenedet noted individual values for various services and /or programs, <br />but lack of information on the actual cost of those services and programs. Chair <br />DeBenedet emphasized the PWET Commission's repeated previous concerns for <br />the need to ensure infrastructure maintenance is ongoing and proactive to avoid <br />higher long -term costs through deferral of that maintenance or a lesser quality of <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.