My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_1025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_1025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2010 11:31:42 AM
Creation date
11/22/2010 11:31:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/25/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 25, 2010 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Improvements;" to Minnesota Dirt Works, Inc.. in the amount of $219,169.90; <br /> contingent upon easement acquisition; and approving Drainage and Ponding <br /> Easement #08- 13- 17 -13 -02 from 2195 Rosewood Lane N (Attachment B), Drai- <br /> nage and Ponding Easement #08- 13- 17 -13 -03 from 2201 N Rosewood Lane (At- <br /> tachment C), and Drainage and Ponding Easement #08- 13- 17 -13 -04 from 2211 N <br /> Rosewood Lane (Attachment D) <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Johnson; Roe; Ihlan; Pust; and Klausing. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> 8. Consider Items Removed from Consent <br /> 9. General Ordinances for adoption <br /> 10. Presentations <br /> 11. Public Hearings <br /> a. Public Hearing for a Minor Subdivision at 3053 Chatsworth <br /> City Planner Thomas Paschke briefly reviewed the request for a MINOR SUB- <br /> DIVISION creating one additional residential parcel out of a single existing par <br /> cel. Mr. Paschke noted additional clarification done earlier today, following dis- <br /> tribution of the Council agenda packet, on minor revisions to actual locations of <br /> lot lines and the actual lot width. Mr. Paschke noted that this created a slightly <br /> larger lot of the north lot at from 102' (48,450 square feet) to 112 119' and mak- <br /> ing it between 53,000 56,000 plus square feet; with the lot to the south not <br /> changing and remaining at 85' in width. <br /> Mr. Paschke noted that modifications had been made in staff's recommended <br /> conditions as outlined in the Request for Council Action (RCA) dated October 25, <br /> 2010, to accommodate potential lot drainage if improved, as well as addressing <br /> topography issues, all to be accomplished prior to recording the plat, with Condi- <br /> tion A specifically addressing certain provisions of existing drainage concerns; as <br /> well as Condition C addressing location of driveway and modifications to ac- <br /> commodate a structure and meet setback requirements. <br /> Revised conditions, provided by staff, from those listed in Section 7.0 of the staff <br /> report are as follows: <br /> a. The applicant shall submit a topographic survey and grading /storm water <br /> management plan for City approval, and implementation of the approved <br /> plan shall be a necessary condition of the administrative approval of the <br /> final survey as required in City Code, Section 10104.04E; <br /> b. The applicant shall verify that setback between the existing home and the <br /> proposed property boundary and, if the setback is less than ten feet (10) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.