My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_1122
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_1122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2010 11:58:24 AM
Creation date
12/14/2010 11:58:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/22/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, November 22, 2010 <br /> Page 21 <br /> 4110 and for safety purposes, industry standards recommended replacement of po- <br /> lice vehicles at 75,000 miles, with projected mileage exceeding that level by <br /> the time the new units were received. Chief Mathwig noted that, based on <br /> recommendations and collected data, the City's Street Maintenance Depart- <br /> ment, advised that annual costs for repair and parts replacement of vehicles <br /> over 75,000 miles averaged at $4,800 annually per vehicle. <br /> Councilmember Roe asked Chief Mathwig to provide the distinction between <br /> unmarked detective vehicles and unmarked squad cars. <br /> Chief Mathwig advised that for Police Department purposes, unmarked detec- <br /> tive units are not included in the 17 units as previously identified; however, <br /> the 17 units included "plain wrapped" vehicles used by the Department. <br /> Councilmember Ihlan requested additional information from staff identifying <br /> what specific vehicles were included in the $772,000 CIP funding list for each <br /> department. <br /> Councilmember Ihlan questioned the ongoing funding of $50,000 annually for <br /> the Fiber Network with Roseville Schools. <br /> Mr. Miller advised that the City had continued to work proactively with the <br /> School District and other partners to proactively build out the community's fi- <br /> ber network over the last 6 -7 years, and indicated that, at the end of 2011, if <br /> the project was funded, all significant City facilities and School facilities <br /> would be connected; all accomplished at a fraction of the total cost, and con- <br /> tinuing to facilitate the City's partnership with these other agencies. <br /> 2. Continue Discussion on the 2011 Tax Levy and Recommended Budget <br /> Councilmember Ihlan reiterated her appreciation to staff for providing the ad- <br /> ditional information, consisting of the Budget Reconciliation (Attachment B) <br /> and 2011 Budget Workpapers (Attachment C).included in the agenda packet <br /> materials dated November 22, 2010. <br /> Councilmember Ihlan questioned the additional $1,050 in the City Council <br /> budget for training; with City Manager Malinen advising that this was funding <br /> for City Councilmembers to attend training opportunities. City Manager Ma- <br /> linen advised that, with two new City Councilmembers coming on board, he <br /> would strongly advocate for their attendance, a minimum, of the League of <br /> Minnesota Cities (LMC)- sponsored newly elected officials training. Mr. Ma- <br /> linen noted that the 2010 Budget had been reduced to include no allocation for <br /> City Council training. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.