My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_1108
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_1108
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2010 2:04:27 PM
Creation date
12/14/2010 2:04:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/8/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, November 08, 2010 <br /> Page 20 <br /> Ms. Radel concurred with Mr. Hall's comments; and noted that current legislation <br /> for this type of project required construction to be initiated by June of 2011, so the <br /> developer would be severely limited in making use of such a provision. <br /> Councilmember Roe asked if the developer would have any problem removing <br /> the land acquisition language from the agreement. <br /> Community Development Director Trudgeon noted other areas of the document <br /> addressing land acquisition that would need revising as well if the City Council so <br /> directed. <br /> Mr. Hall advised that the language in the agreement provided substantial incentive <br /> for the developer to proceed with Phases II and III before the higher figure was <br /> even approached; and that if the developer stopped at Phase I, they would only <br /> qualify for tax increment of between $275,000 $290,000 to fill that gap. Mr. <br /> Hall noted that the developer was motivated to initiate Phases II and III; but fur- <br /> ther noted that the Assisted Living portion had not yet come before the City <br /> Council for their consideration and potential approval. <br /> Council Pust noted other references (page 6, Section 3.2.1) regarding land acqui- <br /> sition and suggested that the City's legal counsel be directed to remove all refer- <br /> ences as applicable throughout the document. <br /> Councilmembers concurred. <br /> Further discussion included the total amount identified to be generated on all three <br /> phases at $2.4 million; but gap financing of only $659,000 strictly identified for <br /> Phase I construction and increment generated on additional phases to complete <br /> Phase I; reiterating legislative restrictions on this type of TIF project for construc- <br /> tion to be implemented by June of 2011; with Mr. hall assuring Councilmembers <br /> that the only portion of the project for which they may consider another TIF re- <br /> quest of the City would be for Phase III, the Assisted Living portion of the project <br /> if so indicated. <br /> Johnson moved, Klausing seconded, approval of a Development Agreement (At- <br /> tachment A as revised and distributed as a bench handout, attached hereto and <br /> made a part thereof) between the City of Roseville and United Properties Resi- <br /> dential LLC, dedicating tax increment from Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Dis- <br /> trict No. 19 to Phase I development at Applewood Pointe of Roseville at Langton <br /> Lake, in substantially 'the form shown in Attachment A of this report; subject to <br /> modification approved by the City Manager and the City's legal counsel; <br /> amended to note those modifications to remove references to land acquisition as <br /> discussed tonight and directed by Council consensus. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.