CC_Minutes_2010_1129 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, November 29, 2010 Page 11 proceed with the land, he could not support it even with mitigation efforts. Council- member Roe questioned how such a use could be good for the neighborhood, given long- term issues from crushing; and expressed his support for the motion. Councilmember Roe expressed his appreciation for the significant background information provided as part of the record; and opined that the resolution provided strong findings. Council- member Roe expressed his appreciation to the neighbors for their thoughtful and informa- tive input; and reiterated a statement made often during testimony, as well as one he'd personally expressed, that once something was built and in operation, it was more diffi- cult to police the property and operations. Mayor Klausing suggested an amendment to the original motion that the resolution, page 9, under #13, include a statement that "the City Council's findings are deter- mined and based on the above referenced items and all information presented to the City Council." With the permission of the Mayor, City Attorney Bartholdi suggested the following language amendments for incorporation into the proposed findings of the draft resolu- tion. Page 3, Finding #8 Introductory Sentence, amend to read as follows: "The use of the subject property for an Asphalt Plant is not a permitted use under the Performance Standards stated in Section 1007 /O1D of the Roseville City Code for the following reasons, based upon evidence presented to the City Council as well as the following sources:" Page 6, Finding #11 Introductory Sentence, amend to read as follows: "The City Council finds the following with respect to the Conditional Use Permit Application, based upon evidence presented to the City Council as well as the fol- lowing sources:" Page 4 and 5, Funding 8G Change date and letter reference of Source as indi- cated by Mr. Trudgeon. Page 9, Additional Findings, #13 Delete Section #13 entirely. City Attorney Bartholdi noted that the draft resolution referenced "Exhibit A," the legal description of the property located at 2280 Walnut Street; however, it was not included as an attachment to the draft resolution, "Attachment M;" however, noted that it would be incorporated into the final resolution as adopted. Mayor Klausing and Councilmember Johnson, as makers of the original motion, con- curred with the friendly amendments suggested by City Attorney Bartholdi. Councilmember Ihlan expressed her preference to include language of what the staff re- port consisted of, as detailed in Section 5.2, #3 of that report. Mayor Klausing opined that the language as amended by City Attorney Bartholdi suffi- ciently addressed that referenced evidence presented.