My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_1129
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_1129
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2011 8:48:38 AM
Creation date
12/20/2010 1:05:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/29/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memorandum to: Kent Peterson <br /> Bituminous Roadways <br /> October 7, 2010 <br /> Page 5 <br /> Table 3: Predicted total future daytime noise levels under normal conditions. <br /> Plant Noise Level Under Total Predicted <br /> Existing Normal Operations at Future Daytime <br /> Location Daytime L50 each Location Noise Levels <br /> #1 59.7 46.1 59.9 <br /> #2 65.9 44.2 66.0 <br /> #3 62.5 41.3 62.5 <br /> #4 56.3 40.4 56.5 <br /> The temporary crushing operation would create additional noise beyond the normal operational <br /> conditions. The crushing operation would be louder than the equipment in use at the plant under <br /> normal operations and would therefore add noise to the proposed project site. The noise levels <br /> created by the crushing operation were calculated for each of the four noise monitoring locations. <br /> These noise values were then added to the predicted future noises levels of the combined existing <br /> noise plus the plant under normal operations. <br /> This returned a predicted future noise level at each location with the addition of the proposed <br /> plant plus while the crushing operation is one site. There are two potential locations on the <br /> project site for the mobile crushing operations. The crusher would be located at each location for <br /> a portion of two to three week period the crusher is on site and in operation: The noise levels <br /> heard at a location are dependant on the distance from the noise source. As a result, for the <br /> calculations in Table 4 that predict the future noise levels at the monitoring locations during <br /> crushing, the crusher location that was closest to each monitoring location was used for the <br /> calculation. This calculation would then provide the greatest possible increase in noise at a <br /> location due to the presence of the plant and the crusher for future noise levels. <br /> Table 4: Total predicted future daytime noise levels site including crushing <br /> Plant Noise Total <br /> Level Under Predicted <br /> Existing Normal Crusher Noise Future <br /> Daytime Operations at Level at each Daytime <br /> Location L50 each Location Location Noise Levels <br /> #1 59.7 46.1 56.7 61.6 <br /> #2 65.9 44.2 56.0 66.6 <br /> #3 62.5 4L3 51.6 62.9 <br /> #4 56.3 40.4 51.0 57.5 <br /> The noise generated by the proposed project during crushing operations will result in a 0.5 to <br /> 1.9 dBA increase to the existing noise levels at the four monitored locations near the project site. <br /> Based on MPCA noise guidance, a 1 dBA increase is not detectable by the human ear and a <br /> 3 dBA increase is considered the threshold of perception (A Guide to Noise Control in <br /> Minnesota; MPCA, 2008). As a result, the small increases in noise created by the proposed <br /> T ■0425.61nmumsu R \1 f 2909 Roseville CU Noiselm[mo-2O) 0-104)6 doe <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.