My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_1129
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_1129
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2011 8:48:38 AM
Creation date
12/20/2010 1:05:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/29/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Larkin <br /> HOj Larkin Hof Daly Lindgren Ltd. <br /> 1�- ATTORNEYS <br /> 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza <br /> 7900 Xerxes Avenue South <br /> Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431-1194 <br /> GENERAL: 952 835 3800 <br /> FAX 952-896-3333 <br /> WES: WWRLIarkklnhoirtnan.CAm <br /> November 10, 2010 <br /> Caroline Bell Beckman <br /> Erickson, Bell, Beckman Quinn, P.A. <br /> 1700 West Highway 36 <br /> Roseville, MN 55113 <br /> Re: Bituminous Roadways, Inc. <br /> Dear Ms. Beckman: <br /> This letter responds to your correspondence of November 1, 2010. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. <br /> (the "Company continues to seek approval from the City of Roseville "City of the <br /> development of its facility as first presented to the City on March 6, 2009. The development of <br /> this industrial facility in an isolated industrial area of the City continues to be a very sound <br /> proposition. <br /> Since that time, and in response to direction from the City, the Company has, in addition to <br /> submitting all required applications for the project, submitted the project for environmental <br /> review conducted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). This environmental <br /> review required that the Company prepare an air emissions facility permit in order that MPCA <br /> could fully evaluate potential air emissions. As a result, MPCA has prepared a draft air <br /> emissions permit which confirms the air emissions for the facility meet state and federal <br /> standards. <br /> The result of the environmental review process to date is that an environmental assessment <br /> worksheet has been prepared which concludes that the proposed facility (including a rail <br /> transload facility which is not currently proposed for construction but was evaluated by MPCA <br /> because it is a potential extension of the project) does not present a potential for significant <br /> environmental effects from the proposed project. <br /> In addition, and in response to issues raised by the City Council's discussions of the Company's <br /> project at recent council meetings, the Company had further evaluated traffic, noise, and odor. <br /> The results of these additional studies were presented to the City concluding that none of those <br /> items would present adverse impacts relating to the proposed project. <br /> The present status of the environmental review is that the technical and scientific analysis of the <br /> project demonstrates the lack of adverse effects from the proposed project. Nevertheless, the <br /> City Council has acted to circumvent the environmental review process by changing its <br /> ordinances after the Company has incurred significant expense in reliance on the direction it <br /> received from the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.