My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_1206
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_1206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2010 1:46:30 PM
Creation date
12/20/2010 1:46:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/6/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 06, 2010 <br /> Page 10 <br /> Councilmember Pust clarified that the City historically borrowed among its funds, <br /> and that it was not a unique situation to the economic downturn of the last few <br /> years. <br /> Mr. Miller advised that the internal borrowing was done some in the past, but not <br /> consistently. <br /> Discussion included the need for internal borrowing to meet monthly expenses <br /> while major revenue from tax payments to Ramsey County was only processed <br /> twice annually; guidelines from the State Auditor's Office for City's to retain at <br /> least a 25% level of reserves, based on the strength of the City's General Fund, <br /> cash flow strength and general guidelines, while deferring that to local decision <br /> making based on local conditions; and the City's Reserve Policy designating a <br /> 50% reserve level. <br /> Further discussion included addressing citizen concerns about the City having <br /> those reserves, while considering other issues in that context, including a periodic <br /> review of that policy based on economic circumstances; and impacts to the City's <br /> bond rating. <br /> Councilmember Roe noted that it was appropriate to have this discussion now be- <br /> fore going into budget discussions; but also could be periodically addressed in the <br /> future as well. <br /> No action taken. <br /> b. Adopt the Final 2011 Tax Levy and Budget <br /> Councilmember Ihlan asked that the City Council work through the new tax levy <br /> dollars tentatively earmarked in the RCA dated December 6, 2010, page 1 and 2, <br /> lines 22 33, to determine if there were other options rather than tax increases. <br /> Councilmember Ihlan sought clarification that the proposed 2011 budget was es- <br /> sentially the 2010 budget with some new obligations as outlined, with few rec- <br /> ommendations for decreased funding. <br /> Mr. Miller concurred that that was a fair assumption in a general sense, noting <br /> that some employee positions had changed, and that other existing positions were <br /> recommended to remain vacant and unfunded; and that some program cuts were <br /> increased in 2011 from 2010. <br /> Councilmember Ihlan sought a summary of those positions remaining unfunded <br /> or vacant. <br /> Mr. Miller advised that there were several positions in public safety; and existing <br /> police officer; and the Assistant Fire Chief position; in addition to one down- <br /> graded position and one elimination in the Community Development Department. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.