CC_Minutes_2010_1206 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, December 06, 2010 Page 12 RCA) appeared to total an approximate aggregate amount of 4 and sought an estimate from Mr. Miller on how much was related to healthcare increases. Mr. Miller estimated that $60- 70,000 was health -care insurance- related, with the rest PERA. Councilmember Pust clarified that PERA was a statutory requirement, not within local control; and that healthcare was within local control, and had been kept down to the extent possible; and opined that during her tenure, she had never seen an annual increase as low as had been achieved for 2011. Councilmember Pust noted that the only thing within the City's discretion was the 1% COLA and step increases. Councilmember Pust, for the benefit of comments received during the Public Hearing, reiterated that pension benefits were mandated by law; and that health care costs were at the lowest and best rates possible to achieve. Line 22 and 23 (RCA) In reviewing the list of new tax levy dollars, Councilmember Ihlan noted her con- cerns with increasing the tax levy for replacing revenue reduction in market value homestead credit aid ($25,000) and replacing revenue reduction in interest earn- ings, court fines, and other state aids, and surplus monies from the License Center ($218,660). Councilmember Ihlan noted the comments heard regarding the poor economy, low property values and high unemployment, and reduced wages, in- cluding no COLA for Social Security recipients given the large senior population in Roseville; as well as the overall business climate; and suggested that it wasn't prudent to raise taxes to facilitate lost revenue as may be possible during better economic times. Councilmember Ihlan opined that specifically the $25,000 seemed an insignificant amount that could be found from other revenue sources or budget cuts. Ihlan moved. Pust seconded (for discussion purposes), to remove $25,000 and $218,660 as above referenced from the 2011 tax levy and budget. Councilmember Pust sought additional information from Mr. Miller on court fine revenue. Mr. Miller expressed hope that projections would be better, but based on current trending, the level or arrests and/or prosecutions revenue was down. City Attorney Gaughan concurred with Mr. Miller, noting from an anecdotal point of view for prosecution, while their case load had not diminished, they were see- ing Ramsey County judges being more cognizant of people coming through the system in the current economy and their ability to pay being diminished, with fines reduced accordingly over the past few years.