My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_9082
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
09xxx
>
9000
>
res_9082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:36:38 AM
Creation date
12/2/2004 8:36:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
9082
Resolution Title
Assessing costs of $23,889.82 to the property at PIN 05-29-23-32-0078-9, City Project W-80-20, adopted and the County Auditor notified accordingly
Resolution Date Passed
5/23/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4. If the adopted assessment differs rrom the proposed assessment as to any particular lot, piece, or parcel <br />ofland, the manager shall mail to the owner a notice stating the amount of the adopted assessment. The <br />manager must also notifY affected owners of any changes adopted by the Council in interest rates or <br />prepayment requirements rrom those contained in the notice of the proposed assessment. <br /> <br />5. Prior to the certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, the owner of any lot, piece, or parcel <br />of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the whole of such assessment, with interest to the date of <br />payment, to the City Treasurer, but no interest shall be charged if such payment is made within 30 days <br />after the date of this resolution. <br /> <br />6. The City Manager shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the <br />assessment roll, with each installment and interest on each unpaid assessment set forth separately, to be <br />extended upon the proper tax lists ofthe County, and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect such <br />assessments in the manner provided by law. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Goedeke and <br />upon roll call vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: P. Johnson, Wiski, Mastel, <br />Goedeke, and V. Johnson and the following voted against the same: None. <br /> <br />Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />ST ATE OF MINNESOTA) <br />) SS <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) <br /> <br />I, the undersigned, beíng the duly qualified City Manager of the City ofRoseville, Ramsey County, <br />Minnesota, hereby certifY that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a <br />meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 23 rd day of May, 1994, with the original thereof on file <br />in my office, as the same relates to Improvement W-80-20. <br /> <br />WITNESS MY HAND as said Manager and the corporate seal of the City this 23rd day of May, 1994. <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />(SEAL) <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.