My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_594
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
00xxx
>
500
>
res_594
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:08:30 AM
Creation date
4/23/2005 5:10:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
594
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EXTRACT OF [UNUTES OF \1EETING OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL <br />OF HOSEVILLE HELD PJJGUST 27, 1962 <br /> <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of <br />the Village Council of the Village of Roseville, 1'1innesota, was duly <br />called and held at the Village Hall in said Village on August 27, 1962, <br />at 8:00 p.m. The following members were present: <br /> <br />f'E-yar HcGee, Trustees Flanagan, Goodrich and Kustermann <br /> <br />and the following n~mbers were absent: None <br /> <br />l\1ember Goodrich introduced the fo11owin:; resolution and moved <br />its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 594 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEOUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING <br />PREPARATION OF REPORT <br /> <br />l'JHEREAS, a certain petition requesting the improvement of Rosedale <br />Drive filed with the Village Council on Jugust 3, 1962, is hereby <br />declared to be signed by the required percentage of owners of property <br />affected thereby. This declaration is made in confanni ty ta !'linnesota <br />Statutes, Section 429.035. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the petition is hereby referred to the Village Engineer <br />and he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed <br />advising the council in a preliminary way as to ,,,hether the proposed <br />improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as <br />proposed or in connection with some other improvement and the estimated <br />cost of the improvement as recommended. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded <br />by Hember Flanagan, and upon a vote being taken, the following voted in <br />favor of the resolution: <br /> <br />Mayor fleGee, Trustees Flanagan, Goodrich and Kustermann <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />WHEREUPON, said Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.