My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6008
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6000
>
res_6008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:08:36 AM
Creation date
4/23/2005 5:12:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />in the office of the village Manager, is approved, and the <br />Manager is directed to publish and mail notice that the Council <br />will meet to consider the proposed assessment on August 30, <br />1973, at the village Hall, 270l North Lexington, in the Village <br />of Roseville, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. The notice shall state <br />the date, time and place of the meeting, the general nature <br />of said improvement, the area proposed to be assessed, that the <br />proposed assessment roll is on file with the Manager, and that <br />written or oral objections thereto by any property owner will be <br />considered. It shall be published in the official newspaper <br />of the Vi~lage at least once, and shall be mailed to the owner <br />of each parcel described in the assessment roll, not less than <br />two weeks prior to the date of said meeting. For the purpose <br />of such mailed notice, owners of said parcels shall be those <br />shown as such on the records of the County Treasurer. Every <br />property owner whose name does not appear on such records <br />(other than owners of property which is tax exempt or is taxed <br />on a gross earnings basis) shall be deemed to have waived such <br />mailed notice unless he has requested in writing that the County <br />Treasurer include his name on the records for this purpose. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was <br /> <br />duly seconded by Councilman Anderson, and upon vote being taken <br /> <br />thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: All <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: None <br /> <br />whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.