Laserfiche WebLink
<br />would have made the development economically unfeasible for <br />the private developer had not the City completed the clean <br />up. There is insufficient tax increment generated by the <br />new development on the site to cover these costs. The <br />remaining sites within the proposed district include three <br />vacant parcels, one redevelopment site and one developed <br />site which is anticipated to be redeveloped at a future <br />date. Environmental review of the sites have uncovered soil <br />contamination. The city and Ryan Construction, the site <br />owner and private developer, are currently working with the <br />Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to develop an appropriate <br />development response action plan for the remediation of the <br />site. Initial estimates are that the cost of clean up will <br />be tween $1-4 million. Without assistance, the new <br />development on the site would be economically unfeasible. <br />The tax increment generated by the proposed new development <br />would also be insufficient to cover the cost of clean up. <br />Therefore, to insure that sites are properly cleaned up and <br />to facilitate new development in accordance with City's <br />goals and objectives within the area, the creation of a <br />hazardous substance subdistrict is deemed necessary. <br /> <br />section 4.03. The Council further finds that other parcels <br />that are not designated as part of the hazardous substance sites <br />are expected to be developed together with a designated hazardous <br />substance site. The specific basis for such finding being: <br /> <br />The site is part of the larger Twin Lakes Redevelopment area <br />which would anticipate redevelopment of the area within a <br />10-15 year timeframe. Development is currently occurring on <br />the site adjacent to the east side of the subdistrict. The <br />private developer is currently in negotiation with the <br />property owner to the west of the subdistrict to acquire the <br />site for future development. <br /> <br />section 4.04. The Council further finds that the <br />subdistrict is not larger than, and the period of time during <br />which increments are elected to be received is not longer that <br />which is necessary to provide for the additional costs due to the <br />designated hazardous substance site. The specific basis for such <br />finding being: . <br /> <br />The district boundaries have been set to coincide with the <br />contaminated sites which have been identified to date and <br />certain adjacent parcels, being developed with the <br />contaminated sites. The subdistrict will be in place as <br />long as necessary to recover the cost of cleanup as <br />identified in the development response action plan. If the <br />City is successful in its lawsuit to recover costs, the <br />funds recovered form the previous property owner will be <br />applied to the clean up and the subdistrict will be retired <br />sooner. <br /> <br />268465.1 <br /> <br />4 <br />