res_9109 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF ROSEVILLE RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City ofRoseville, Minnesota, was held in the City Hall in said City on Monday, October 10, 1994, at 5:30 o'clock p.m. The following members were present: Goedeke, P. Johnson, Mastel, Wi ski, and V. Johnson, and the following were absent: None. Councilmember Goedeke introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 9109 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS PURCHASE OF 11-29-23-34-0027 WHEREAS, parcel 11-29-23-34-0027 is currently tax forfeit; and WHEREAS, the City ofRoseville has been approached by property owners surrounding Milton Court regarding subdivisions of their properties in order to create new buildable single-family lots; and WHEREAS, the construction of a cul-de-sac on Milton Court by the City will allow the combination of parcel 11-29-23-34-0027 with adjoining parcels to create buildable single-family lots; and WHEREAS, a parcel of tax forfeit property can be returned to the tax rolls by sale at a public auction or by purchase by the City for market rate and sale to the highest bidder following proper notice; and WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Assessor has set the market value for parcel 11-29-23-34-0027 at $2,529.75; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rose vi lIe, Minnesota, that parcel 11-29-23-34-0027 be purchased by the City ofRoseville for $2,529.75; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City ofRoseville advertise the sale of parcel 11-29-23-34-0027 to the highest bidder with the following conditions: 1. Minimum bid of $2,900.00 2. Lot 11-29-23-34-0027 must be combined with adjoining lot or lots for single-family use 3. Bids be opened on November I, 1994. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Wiski and upon roll call vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Goedeke, P. Johnson, Mastel, Wiski" and V. Johnson and the following voted against: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.