res_6214 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Alternate A--excuse me--on Alternate C there's approximately $300 less than Alternate A, is that right? MR. HONCHELL: About $250. MR. O'MEARA: I think this probably offsets quite a bit of the inequities that Ken Reinhardt mentioned with the storm sewer that's already in the area. I happen to be the owner of the majority of that property that (inaudible) storm sewer go through it at that time and if there's some compromise that can be reached because of this inequity I'd certainly be glad to accept that, I guess. I also own Lots 14 and l5 which it was brought up--they have a narrow frontage at the front and that they may in fact not be developed into two lots. I guess my only answer is that I'd be willing to take my chances on those lots. They're both ideal lots for development and there's no doubt that we would have to have some waiver because of the short frontage there, but I think with a properly designed home they would make beautiful lots. MAYOR LINEBARGER: It doesn't appear there's anyone else that would like to be heard. We've given you all a chance to speak. MR. HARLEN D. JEPPESEN, 2203 N. Victoria~ Can I have a copy of the minutes of this one section here sent to me. MAYOR LINEBARGER: I'll have to refer that to the Manager. I don't know if the minutes in complete detail are going to be transcribed or not. MR. JEPPESEN: And that letter I wrote. MAYOR LINEBARGER: That will be entered in the minutes. I will close the hearing now. COUNCILMAN CURLEY: It seems to be evident to most people-- I think it's my opinion that the land should be developed. Just a little bid (inaudible) technicalities when we talk about Alternate A and B, but I think that the Public Works Administra- tor's recommendation (inaudible) and I would have to favor P~n A. COUNCILMAN DEMOS: If Plan A was the one petitioned for, that takes three votes. . Would Plan B take 4?