Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY OF <br />COUrJCIL OF ROSEVI LLE, MINNESOTA-HELD JANUARY 23, 1978 <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City <br />Council of the City of Roseville, ~1innesota, was duly called and held at the <br />City Hall in said City on the January 23, 1978. <br />The fo11m'iing members were present: Mayor Dem:>s, Counci1.men Franke, <br />Kehr, Anderson and Curley <br />and the fo 11 owi ng members were absent: None <br />Member Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its <br />adoption: <br /> <br />Resolution No. 6606 <br /> <br />AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 6553 REGARDING CORRECTION OF <br />APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS RELATING <br />TO STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT SERIES No.4 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 6553, dated September 12,1977, the City <br /> <br />Council of the City of Rosevi11e, ~linnesota, made an apportionment of assess- <br /> <br />ments for Storm Sewer Improvement Series #4, as follows: <br /> <br />Parcel (1) 79-00500-090-02 <br /> <br />UNPLATTED LANDS <br />Ex S 828.18 ft of SE~ & ex pt N of ext SL of B1k 2 <br />PARRANTO IND PK; a 140 ft R/~J i n W~ of SE~ E of Ry <br />& a 75 ft esmt in SW!4 of NE~ W of sd Ry & in NW~. <br />Also ex pt E of W 941 ft; beg on EL of Ry R/W & <br />626.25 ft N of SL of NE~; th SE 268.7 ft; th S 29 <br />deg 57 min W 180.45 ft; the curve L 313.3 ft to pt <br />on SL of NE~ & 831.9 ft E of SW cor; th ~J to Ry R/W; <br />th NE to beg (subj to rds) in Sec 5, T 29, R 23. <br /> <br />AREA <br />-- <br /> <br />2.89 ac. <br /> <br />TOTAL A~1OurH <br />$2312.00 <br /> <br />Parcel (2) 79-00500-100-02 <br />UNPLATTED LANDS <br />Ex W 941 ft; the fo1, beg on EL of Ry R/W & 626.25 <br />ft N of SL of NE~ the SE 268.7 ft; th S 29 deg 57 <br />Olin 180.45 ft; th curve L 313.3 ft to pt on SL of <br />llE!4 & 331.9 ft E of SW cor thereof; th to Ry R/W; <br />th NE to beg in Sec 5, T 29, R 23. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, it appears that the assessment for Parcel (2) in said resolution <br /> <br />should have been added to the assessment for Parcel (1); and <br /> <br />~mEREAS, it appears that the assessment is, therefore, not equitable and <br /> <br />must be corrected under Minnesota Statutes ~429.071, Subsection 3; and <br /> <br />.34 ac. 272.00 <br />