My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6676
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6600
>
res_6676
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:18 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:56:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6676
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. UL-78-13 Alternate 1, under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
7/10/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />/;} tt: <br />~"'-~~- (.~ / ? ( <br /> <br />Extract of i'1inutes of Heetin<T <br />of City Council <br />City of Roseville <br />Ramsey County, r~innesota <br /> <br />July 10, 1978 <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting <br /> <br />of the City Council of the City of Roseville, j'1innesota, \-ras <br />hale in the City Hall in said City on ~1on~ay, July 10, 1978, at <br /> <br />7~30 o'clock p.m. <br /> <br />The follm.1ing Members were present~ Mayor Demos and <br /> <br />Councilmen Kehr, Anderson, Pranke and Curley: an0 the following <br /> <br />were absent~ None. <br /> <br />Also present \'lere James F. ]\..nn.re I Ci ty t1anaqer~ Robert <br /> <br />Bell, City Attorney, Charles Bonchell, City Public Horks <br /> <br />Director, and Peter S. Popovich, City Bond Consultant. <br /> <br />r'IAYOR Dmms.. The next imnrovernent hearing is for street <br />lights on Evelyn and Brenner - UL-78-l3. <br /> <br />NRo k\JDRE.. I have the affidavit of publication and <br />Certificate of Hailing the Notice of Hearing on this project. <br /> <br />~"R. HONCHELL.. This project is for toe proposed construc- <br />tion of street liqhting on ~renner Avenue and Evelyn Street. <br />The proposal \\1ould be to have two di fferent arrangements - t"TO <br />alternatives to be considered by the Council tonight. This is <br />because we have had some input from the citizens that they <br />desire to have a heavier level of lighting than the original <br />proposal envisionec. <br /> <br />This petition "Tas signed by 69% of the property o,"mers <br />involved that would be assessed. The overhead projection <br />you're looking at is a little confusing, we agree, but this is <br />not an easy one to depict. The small yellow circles at the <br />corner of Cleveland and Brenner and County Roa~ Q and Evelyn <br />are t,"J'O street lights "7hich are not there today. This one is <br />slightly - about one lot do,^m, and "roulc1 be moved to tl-tat <br />location. (Inaucible) other one would be placed. There wouln <br />be no expense to these lights. The reason for this is that <br />the City has a policy that says on corners and in mid-blocks <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.