Laserfiche WebLink
<br />it's $119.50, up from the $45.79. ~his then would be spread <br />also over a two year period, which 18 our recommendation, with <br />an 8% carrying charge, half paid one year and half the other <br />year. <br /> <br />HR. ANDRE: There are no communications. <br /> <br />~mYOR DEr~OS: I would like to open the hearing to the <br />public and like to hear your comments. Come to the microphone <br />and give your name and address. <br /> <br />MRS. CAROL SCHUETZ, 3083 Evelyn: I originated this <br />petition and I feel at this time that we should stick with the <br />first plan because so many of the houses do not have boulevard <br />trees and the ones that do are small, so we do not have the <br />shadows that we might have at a later date. So perhaps in <br />four or five years down the line perhaps we could evaluate the <br />situation and decide whether we need one or two or how many more <br />lights. <br /> <br />r4AYOR DE~DS: Anyone else on this matter of street lights? <br />Would you like to express your preference for Alternate 1 or 2? <br />Anyone else that wishes to spe~( on the matter of street liqhts? <br />If not, I will close the hearinq and ask the Council to make <br />its deliberations. <br /> <br />COUNCILr.1AN FR.1\tlKE: Do you think two are enough? <br /> <br />COUNCILr~~ CURLEY: I have no opinion because I don't live <br />there. This lady was for Alternate 1. <br /> <br />COUNCILrmN FRANKE~ She said they don't have too much <br />shadows and she thought Alternate I would do the job. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE then introduced the following resolution <br />and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />Resolution No. 6676 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION <br />OF IHPROVEi,mUT NO. UL-78-l3 <br />ALTERNATE I; UNOER AND PURSUANT <br />TO rlINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 429 <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville, <br />f.tinnesota, that in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota <br />Statutes 1961, Chapter 429, as amended, the Council held a <br />public hearing on the proposed construction of Improvement No. <br />UL-78-13, consisting of the installation of ornamental street <br />lights on Evelyn Street between County Road D and Brenner <br />Avenue, and on Brenner Avenue between Cleveland Avenue and <br />Evelyn Street, as described in the Notice of Hearing at a cost <br />