CC_Minutes_2010_1213 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, December 13, 2010 Page 14 what process would apply for these proposed performance standards versus Con- ditional Use criteria. Also, related to when building permits were processed, were similar questioned asked on those applications to determine if and how the applicant met those stan- dards; and whether that was part of the administrative process or assumed. Ms. Dushin addressed CONTROL MEASURES and where they were now lo- cated in the proposed text; opining that among various drafts, they appeared to have been removed, and Ms. Dushin expressed her preference that they be reins- tated unless they were addressed elsewhere in the document. Ms. Dushin noted that the Planning Commission minutes had not been posted on the City's website since June of 2010; and asked that they added. Depending on the PERFORMANCE STANDARDS response, Ms. Dushin asked that the table addressing chemicals not involving "noxious" odors be addressed and stated as a positive, rather than the previous double negative. Mr. Trudgeon advised that in the PERFORMANCE STAN- DARDS /ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, the first statement applied to all uses; with any existing use needing to comply or correct their actions to be com- pliant, or they were not a permitted use. Mr. Trudgeon advised that all applicants for building permits must demonstrate compliance, an outcome of previous discussions over the summer, which will be a new procedure for us, and new language will be added to building permit applica- tion forms as indicated. Mr. Trudgeon advised that it was the intent of staff that applicants would demonstration in writing the impacts and how they intend to meet those standards, at which time staff will review them and determine if they are acceptable or not. Related to CONTROL MEASURES, Mr. Trudgeon advised that the language proposed in I -2A ZONIND DISTRICT was currently on the books; with only one (1) parcel in the entire City zoned for that heavy manufacturing use. Mr. Trudge on advised in staff's review of the laundry list in the existing code, several were already contained in other areas of the proposed code (noise and traffic) and other items (delivery; security of premises or buildings) were puzzling and staff ques- tioned whether staff should or could review and /or enforce. Mr. Trudgeon advised that he had recently noted the omission of Planning Com- mission meeting minutes on the City's website, and advised that would be cor- rected at staff's earliest convenience.