CC_Minutes_2010_1213 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

655 all of the specific ramifications for not meeting those requirements, there were a number of issues 656 and concerns, including any and all federal and state funding passed through state agencies to 657 municipalities that would be impacted. Mr. Paschke further advised that Metropolitan Council 658 had its own regional Comprehensive Plan that was inclusive of each municipality within the 659 regions that addressed the regional infrastructure system (i.e., roads, sanitary sewer capacities) 660 many of which were initially funded for and/or developed by the Metropolitan Council. 661 Lisa Belak 662 Ms. Belak questioned if the Comprehensive Plan was submitted to the Metropolitan Council with 663 minimal changes for the community, recognizing that the City of Roseville already exceeded 664 many municipalities. 665 Commissioner Boerigter reiterated previous notes that the Comprehensive Plan Update was a 2 -3 666 year process, with numerable public meetings held to discuss various components, and those 667 areas being designated for high density residential, in addition to the countless and thoughtful 668 discussions prior to submission of the Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council. 669 Ms. Belak reiterated her question as to whether a Comprehensive Plan had been presented 670 consisting of minimal changes; with Chair Doherty responding in the negative. 671 Commissioner Boerigter noted that the citizens of Roseville had spoken through the Imagine 672 Roseville 2025 community visioning process, as well as at other public information meetings, 673 providing a clear synopsis of their preferred vision for the 2030 Roseville community. 674 Ms. Belak opined that that opinion did not seem to reflect the opinion of those in attendance at 675 tonight' s meeting. 676 Chair Doherty noted that the Comprehensive Plan did not reflect the Metropolitan Council's 677 guidance mandating for 8,000 new housing units in Roseville. 678 Chair Doherty closed the Public Hearing at 8:56 p.m. 679 Recess 680 Chair Doherty recessed the meeting at 8:56 p.m. and reconvened at 9:09 p.m. 681 Commission and Staff Discussion 682 Chair Doherty suggested breaking the discussion into components to address specific issues 683 brought forward during public comment. Chair Doherty respectively requested that the audience 684 respect this time of discussion among Commissioners and staff and avoid attempts to interject. 685 Har Mar Mall (southern property at Har Mar Mall and whether original zoning 686 designation was R -1 with special use parking versus zoning designation as R -1) 687 Chair Doherty requested that individual commissioners provide their interest in whether to 688 entertain a motion to consider recommending to the City Council a Comprehensive Plan 689 Amendment on zoning designation for this property.