CC_Minutes_2010_1213 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1104 Ms. Rhees suggested that the 50% rule be applied, rather than a designated 5' to avoid equipment 1105 or other bulky items blocking window openings, with everything else allowed. ID 1106 Paragraph L Trash Storage Areas 1107 Mr. Paschke advised that staff did not concur that this item should be addressed in this language, 1108 but that it would be in addressed in another place in City Code. 1109 1004.03 Table of Allowed Uses 1110 Discussion included specific standards, with Mr. Paschke noting that some of those standards 1111 remained, some remained from current code, some would be revised, and some were entirely 1112 new. Mr. Paschke advised that those standards for redevelopment would come before the 1113 Commission for review in the future; and cross referencing the various sections was an ongoing 1114 process. Mr. Paschke noted, as an example, the reference on Page 4, Section 1004.04, C that 1115 made such a reference; and further noted that staff recommended the current reference format. 1116 Mr. Paschke advised that a permit was required for a majority of uses in Roseville. 1117 Further discussion ensued regarding the meaning of "permitted," whether an allowed use or 1118 conditional. Mr. Paschke clarified that if it was deemed a permitted use, it was an allowed use 1119 under that district; but conditional uses needed to move through the Conditional Use application 1120 process, which was standard across land use considerations. 1121 After further consideration, it was the consensus of members and staff that additional language be 1122 included related to Conditional Use processes in Section 1004.03,b. 1123 1004.03 Neighborhood Business (NB) District (Numbering of Sections) 1124 Mr. Paschke noted that this section should be identified as "Section 1004.04," and subsequent 1125 numbers adjusted accordingly. 1126 Paragraph C, Dimensional Standards 1127 Mr. Paschke advised that staff concurred that there is a need for additional references related to 1128 storm water management requirements; however, he noted that those requirements were located 1129 in separate and distinct areas of code as indicated by the various area wetland management 1130 organizations and shoreland management requirements. Mr. Paschke advised that the 30% 1131 maximum impervious lot coverage in residential districts would also be addressed under 1132 permissible storm water management techniques and included by reference, as well as mitigation 1133 options for homeowners for their specific property. 1134 Paragraph D Frontage Requirements 1135 Discussion included potential lot lines falling within designated trail areas, but typically located 1136 in public rights -of -way; with Mr. Paschke noting that the City Attorney had also commented and 1137 requested clarification related to setbacks and addressing easements. 1138 1004.04 Community Business (CB) District, Paragraph D. Parking Placement 1139 Following discussion, it was the consensus of staff and members that the same standards related 1140 for parking be revised and applied to this section for consistency with Paragraph F of the 1141 Regional Business parking requirements.