Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(9) variances on parcels from which no right- <br />of-way or easement has ever been provided, <br />if such right-of-way or easement is necessary <br />for conformance with City or County roadway <br />or utility standards; and <br /> <br />(IO) variances where the location of the proposed <br />construction would fall within the setback <br />areas required by City Code when applied to <br />the City plan for roadway widening. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the <br />was duly seconded by member ~ <br />being taken, the following voted in <br />All present <br />and the following voted against the same. <br />None <br /> <br />foregoing Resolution <br />, and upon a vote <br />favor of the Resolution: <br /> <br />WHEREUPON, the said Resolution was declared duly <br />passed and adopted. <br /> <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA } <br />) ss. <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) <br /> <br />I, the undersignedr being the duly qualified and <br />acting Manager of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, do hereby <br />certify that I have carefully compared the attached and fore- <br />going extract of the minutes of a regular meeting of the <br />City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, held on the <br />?1Rt- day of May , 1979, with the original on file <br />in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript <br />therefrom insofar as the same relates to setting forth City <br />polciy on requiring dedication of easements and right-of-way <br />at the time of acting upon application for subdivisions, special <br />use permit, building permitsr and variances. <br /> <br />WITNESS my hand as such Manager and the corporate seal <br />of the City Council of Roseville, Minnesota, this ??nn day <br />of May , 1979. <br /> <br />( SEAL) <br />