My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0103
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0103
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2011 10:34:27 AM
Creation date
1/24/2011 10:34:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/3/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, January 03, 2011 <br /> Page 13 <br /> ings on budget issues and those challenges, City Manager Malinen advocated that <br /> upcoming meetings be more focused on a dialogue among Councilmembers and <br /> staff on creation of a work plan or strategic plan reflecting collective City Council <br /> priorities over the next few years. City Manager Malinen noted the difficulties in <br /> holding those meetings off -site and attempting videotaping for public informa- <br /> tion; and suggested that future meetings be planned in the City Council Cham- <br /> bers. City Manager Malinen noted past practices to hold meetings on Saturday <br /> mornings, but identified several Monday evenings January 31 and February 7 <br /> that were currently available for a potential work plan meeting. City Manager <br /> Malinen also advised that the community survey was currently being mailed out <br /> and suggested that the City Council may wish to delay their work plan meeting <br /> until receipt of survey data, estimated to be approximately February 20, 2010; in <br /> order to include that valuable information to factor into priority discussions. Mr. <br /> Malinen encouraged Councilmembers to use a facilitator at the meeting to keep it <br /> organized and on task. <br /> Councilmember Willmus expressed his opposition to the need for a facilitator, <br /> opining that he preferred a more informal discussion with staff and City Council <br /> members. <br /> Mayor Roe sought clarification from Councilmember Willmus, whether his con- <br /> cerns with a facilitator were based on cost or process issues. <br /> Councilmember Willmus advised that he felt a more general discussion would be <br /> accomplished without a facilitator, but noted that cost is a concern, while not an <br /> overriding one. <br /> Councilmember McGehee expressed her preference not to have a facilitator, al- <br /> lowing for a more open discussion with staff without need of a mediator. Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee suggested that the meeting be done without a facilitator, and <br /> if it proved ineffective, a facilitator could be used the next time around. <br /> Councilmember Johnson advised that he had attended one strategic meeting with <br /> and one without a facilitator; and opined that he felt the one without a facilitator <br /> had proven very productive, and concurred with Councilmembers Willmus and <br /> McGehee that a facilitator was not needed. <br /> Mayor Roe volunteered his services as a facilitator for the meeting, and expressed <br /> confidence that he would steer the process to meet expectations for the day and <br /> the agenda, while being able to participate in discussions as well. <br /> Councilmember McGehee expressed her preference for meeting earlier in the year <br /> rather than waiting for survey results. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.